Rudy endorsed https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1293835127122997248?s=20

Philadelphia NYC Chicago Oregon State Police end defense of federal courthouse in Portland, DHS reacts

https://twitter.com/AQtime/status/1294574152037347328?s=20

President Trump Rudy's NY police Benevolent association speech President Trump is asked about Marjorie Taylor Greene and Qanon at an early press briefing. POTUS dodges the question.

Post 10287455 24 minutes ago • View on 8kun JUST THE BEGINNING Does that mean POTUS… gave the orders? Get 'em Q+, o7. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/14/trump-durham-probe-netting-guilty-plea-its-just-be/ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-clinesmith-guilty-plea-durham-russia-just-beginning https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/14/trump-durham-probe-netting-guilty-plea-its-just-be/ https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1294331256814080000?s=19 Fight, Fight, Fight

Post 10285792 37 minutes ago • View on 8kun 1PM REMINDER - CIA CONTROLS DISNEY AND HOLLYWOOD also this 1 WEEK OPERATION #DISNEYGATE DATE: 08/10/20 - 08/15/20 Welcome to the WAR. We are Anonymous. (You) have been chosen to help in this battle of Information Warfare. We will be Targeting Disney and Posting anything and everything we have re: GHISLAINE/EPSTEIN/CLINTONS/ANDREW throughtout above Date. The disney companies long association with CIA is also well documented and they have used their parks and entertainment operations to traffic in children… SCOUTS - Notify /WARROOM/ when a target tweets, Report all negative comments directed at TA/Flanks. TA - Post Directly to Primary Targets (Qmap/Memes/Caps/Vids/Intel) Flanks - Repost TA postings directly to Secondary Targets Operations - Please Share this Operation flyer. Any anon OP-ED/youtube to push? TARGET: >Primary: .@Disney .@ABC .@ARobach .@BillClinton .@HillaryClinton .@TheDukeofYork >Secondary: .@CNN .@nbc .@MSNBC .@nytimes .@washingtonpost .@USATODAY .@WSJ .@business (bloomberg) .@HuffPost .@Newsweek .@TIME HASH: #DISNEYGATE (Pick 1-2 per line) #EPSTEINDIDNOTKILLHIMSELF #ABC #CLINTONFOUNDATION #PRINCEANDREW #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinIsland #ChildLivesMatter #pedogate2020 #SAVETHECHILDERN #pedowoodexposed #ClintonCrimesAgainstChildren #AndrenoChrome #pizzagatelsreal #ChildTrafficking #BillClintonisAPedo #StopHumanTrafficking >Disney owns ABC and 21st Century Fox >Susan Rice's brother started his career out working for disney. >Disney cruise line visits Little St. James Island. >disney chair flew on Lolita. >Ex-VP guilty sex abuse. Clinton Foundation https://qanonbin.com/paste/jRshEQbV6 QMAP Patriots Don't Sleep https://qmap.pub/read/144 There's a Link Between Disney and Esptein Island https://qmap.pub/read/3497 Former Walt Disney VP Sentenced to Prison in Child Sex Abuse Investigation https://qmap.pub/read/3499 High Profile CEO Resignation: Disney's Bob Iger to Step Down https://qmap.pub/read/3883 Disney's Pinocchio: Little Boys Taken to Islands… https://qmap.pub/read/4588 MEMES Disneygate https://mega.nz/folder/gcgnySBR#9bcRU8rrOOlGs8gxdMyH7g Epstein Island https://mega.nz/folder/DwNkwAZQ#xa6JLeW9_632P0yw3MhlNw Epstein, Maxwell + Pals https://mega.nz/folder/gVoTxaYY#nxyEj0ZoKZTzPyIgslhZUw Clintons https://mega.nz/#F!pRY0jShJ!-NUlzXxvhTopV1GO2c89tg Prince Andrew https://mega.nz/folder/sYJ2zSYB#8HbPvzwhFlQKiwKVt30Jnw Arrests General https://mega.nz/folder/gdxHzDpJ#RPX2uKWPCy6jFAB2hBHHHg CAPS Misc https://imgur.com/a/Qey7kso DisneyGate https://imgur.com/a/CFUpDjA Ghislaine https://imgur.com/a/ynAH8ft Docs: https://imgur.com/a/tDuhdbl ABC https://imgur.com/a/2jyIL42 Andrew https://imgur.com/a/xl4xacR VIDS Amy Robach ABC News anchor say her disney network sat on the epstein story for 3 years. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7vfryk INTEL ABCU - #DarkSideOfDisney https://twitter.com/ABCU_8/status/1291486661633687552 https://repub.li/the-dark-side-of-disney-sex-trafficking-child-predators/ Archive: https://archive.is/9Iayy https://8kun.top/abcu/res/5.html#2235 (More ABCU) Ghislaine Maxwell (Epstein) documents have been unsealed. https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1289009776433782786 Prince Andrew Allegedly Used a Puppet of Himself to Grope Victims (Virginia Roberts) at Jeffrey Epstein’s Home https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/08/prince-andrew-puppet-jeffrey-epstein-virginia-giuffre-assault-allegations According to former Reddit Ellen Pao, “we knew” underage girls were sex trafficked by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2011 https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1280032579752570880 Is 'Whistleblower' Attorney Into 'disney Girls' And Visiting Amusement Parks Alone? https://www.zerohedge.com/political/whistleblower-attorney-disney-girls-and-visiting-amusement-parks-alone https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/962513729756844032 James O'Keefe Have you signed our petition demanding answers from @Disney and @ABC on #EpsteinCoverup? https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1191870581265903616 2 Disney workers, retired middle school principal nabbed in Florida child porn sting https://www.foxnews.com/us/disney-workers-middle-school-principal-florida-child-porn-sting Inside Club 33, Disneyland's $10,000 Per Year Dining Club https://www.eater.com/2013/1/28/6489395/inside-club-33-disneylands-10000-per-year-dining-club Facebook blocked save the children and people slams Zuckerberg for ‘normalizing pedophilia’ https://todaynewstalk.com/2020/08/06/facebook-blocked-save-the-children-and-people-slams-zuckerberg-for-normalizing-pedophilia/ Disney Heiress Tweets About Kobe: ‘The Man Was A Rapist. Deal With It.’ https://truepundit.com/disney-heiress-tweets-about-kobe-the-man-was-a-rapist-deal-with-it/ – PUBLIC MSG: https://qanonbin.com/paste/4YpZHIjqs – SIGN THE PETITION: http://EpsteinCoverup.com -o7 WARROOM https://8kun.top/warroom/

Post 10282657 2 hours ago • View on 8kun Trump Admin Seizes Multiple Oil Tankers Carrying Iranian Oil The Trump administration has reportedly “confiscated cargo” on four oil tankers that were en route to Venezuela carrying Iranian oil. The Wall Street Journal reported that the move comes as the administration looks to up its “campaign of maximum pressure” against the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-trump-admin-seizes-multiple-oil-tankers-carrying-iranian-oil

Post 10282620 4 hours ago • View on 8kun Republican convention theme revealed: ‘Honoring the Great American Story’ EXCLUSIVE: The theme of the upcoming 2020 GOP convention will be “Honoring the Great American Story” and will highlight America’s “greatness, opportunity and President Donald Trump’s bold leadership,” Fox News has learned. The Trump campaign on Thursday afternoon had back to back phone calls with Republican members of Congress, previewing the themes for the 2020 Republican National Convention, a source familiar with the calls told Fox News. The Trump campaign on Thursday afternoon had back to back phone calls with Republican members of Congress, previewing the themes for the 2020 Republican National Convention, a source familiar with the calls told Fox https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republican-convention-theme-revealed-honoring-the-great-american-st See also Trump on RNC convention: ‘I’ll probably be giving my speech at the White House’ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-on-rnc-convention-ill-probably-be-giving-my-speech-at-the-whi

Post 10282644 2 hours ago • View on 8kun Oregon State Police Pull Out Of Protecting Portland Courthouse After City Refuses To ‘Prosecute This Criminal Behavior,’ Department Says The Oregon State Police announced on Thursday that it was pulling out its roughly 100 state troopers from protecting the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse in downtown Portland after the city’s district attorney announced that he is not pursuing charges against the rioters who have been arrested. The Oregon State Police had committed to helping local law enforcement officials deal with the violent riots for a period of two weeks, which has now expired. https://www.dailywire.com/news/oregon-state-police-pull-out-of-protecting-portland-courthouse-after-city-refuses-to-prosecute-this-criminal-behavior-department-says

Post 10272808 3 hours ago - View on 8kun Trump says Democrats' mail-in ballot push holding up coronavirus stimulus package https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-democrats-mail-in-voting-money-coronavirus-stimulus-package From 8/12 News Conference

The process of documenting the shells of accounts @jack Dorsey left me with was painful. 4 previous accounts all locked down at once. It wasn't just a blank screen - saying your account has been suspended, they let you look around but you cant DO anything. No backing anything up, no list, no followers, nothing. /@jack I have it recorded including all my analytics, in case I need to send it to a lawyer when we get around to the litigation phase../ As of this moment I am unaware how large this wave of take downs is. I felt the urge to document my outrage of being silenced on a social media platform. The sharing of open sourced research and current events with others, should NEVER be censored. I rarely replied to anyone I tried my hardest to not push people buttons or share the deepest rabbit hole material publicly because I knew they were looking for any reasons to ban us. My primary function was to share what I found elsewhere after I ran it through my personal BS filter and discern the level of readiness for the general public. I have the ability to consume vast amounts of data, the common sense to discern what was real and what wasn't, and the desire to show others how to do what I do. My reach has been limited for a long time. I've practiced decent camouflage over the last 2 years on all alternate accounts. I suspect they took them due to the early usage of hastags or potentially the rapid following that the program tweetduck allowed me to do across all acounts. Maybe the simultaneous follows set off flags, who knows. I knew I was shadow banned, I knew I was ghost banned, I knew I was censored but something told me to keep pushing on. I maintained decent impression numbers but also knew I could never fill the role of a large account due to family life. Comfy but fighting every day. Ive spent my last 3 years primarily on twitter but scattered everywhere (digging, watching, archiving, listening, clipping videos, decodes, /qresearch/ etc.) I attempted to start the creation of a new account on Twitter but something is telling me that twitter is dead or damn near it. I believe it will become more and more irrelevant by the day. Especially when POTUS either leaves it or is removed from it. I am going to be shifting my focus to other platforms down the road and attempt to maintain these articles to a higher standard. Ive always tried to be humble about this site. Primarily because a large portion of it is not me, and I am not a professional web developer, nor a journalist. I am a factory worker and a father of 3 children who just needed to fight for a better future for my family. My goal was to build a small independent ad free news site where it tied as many people together as possible and functioned as a home base to blog the big important news of the day. Simultaneously providing the behind the scenes look at what we do and access to all of our notables. I'm not into begging for money and I hate ads. I truly believe we are moving in to a tip based society and people will reward those that provide value to them. If you get canceled or need/want a new home, create an account and send me a request to blog via email with a link to some of your work and Ill get your permissions switched over to allow post creation. If you do like this type of post from me, hit that heart button so I know. Maybe I will start to focus my attention to my own project and away from others. What do you think? WWG1WGA

Post 10146362 7 hours ago • View on 8kun VOTE-BY-MAIL OREGON FOREWORD: This information is taken from public web searches, wiki, and other public facing resources. The author neither endorses nor supports this information as true or factual. This is simply an example of what is used to promote to the public “Trust us, we’re the Government”. A BRIEF HISTORY • 1981 the Oregon Legislative Assembly approves vote-by-mail for local elections • 1987 Vote-by-mail becomes permanent • 1989 House bill to extend vote-by-mail to include 1990 primary defeated 33-27 • 1992 Governor’s Task Force on Local Government Services identifies statewide vote-by-mail significant savings on elections (fox in hen house). • 1995 Oregon becomes the first state to conduct federal primary election all by mail. • 1996 Ron Wyden is elected by mail 66% turnout, succeeding Bob Packwood* • 1998 Oregonians confirm ‘overwhelming’ support for vote-by-mail by passing measure 60. *** • 2000 Oregon becomes the first state to conduct Presidential election entirely by mail, 80% turnout. ** • 2019 Oregon becomes first state to not require postage on vote-by-mail ballot return envelopes. * According to State of Oregon records the turnout in 1996 was 37.75% not 66% as Wikipedia claims. ** 2000 Election turnout according to state of Oregon data was 51.29% not 80% as Wikipedia claims. *** Measure 60 eliminated restrictions on vote-by-mail and established it as the single form of voting for elections in Oregon. It also required vote-by-mail to be used for biennial primaries and general elections as well as eliminating polling places. MYTHS Vote-by-mail will increase participation In theory this common claim would make sense however the data shows that this is indeed not the case. Some of this is possibly also due to the shift in focus away from teaching civic duty, and patriotism in public schools during the same time frame. [See Img 1] #1 Lowest voter turnout since 1960 #2 Second lowest since 1960 In point of fact if you look after the vote-by-mail became permanent in Oregon, the lowest voter participation in recent history is seen. SOURCES: [See Paste] Vote-by-mail is secure -Secure- a: free from danger b: affording safety a secure hideaway c: trustworthy, dependable a secure foundation d: free from risk of loss Considering there is no way to verify your vote is counted this argument cannot be substantiated by anyone, but politicians and their media allies regurgitating their talking points. There is no way to validate your vote has been counted. There is no way to know the vote went from your hands directly to an election official. There is absolutely no confidence. Politicians like Senator Ron Wyden (who lives in New York, not in the state he purportedly represents) say, “His” state has proven over 20 years that vote-by-mail has been a success. Not a lie exactly, it has maintained a one-party rule over the state since inception, and allowed plenty of corruption. A success under someone’s standards. The previous Governor John Kitzhaber resigned due to corruption, he’s also the one that gave Oregon the current Governor Kate Brown who filled in and easily won re-election. Kate Brown has struggled with allegations of abuse of power and corruption since taking office. Birds of a feather. Governor Kate Brown signed Oregon Motor Voter (House Bill 2177) into law in March, 2015. 90% of eligible Oregonians are registered to vote. [See paste] Oregon Gov. Kate Brown expected to sign illegal immigrant driver's licenses bill. [See paste] Kate Brown isn’t from Oregon, but she fully controls it. Consider the following: • Become the Governor of a state that is fully vested in vote-by-mail • Ensure everyone is registered to vote automatically at the DMV (may select party for you) • Grant non-citizens (read Illegal Aliens) the right to obtain a driver’s license The above factors practically ensure unlimited control perpetuality. Allowing illegal aliens to obtain a driver’s license which automatically registers them to vote is exactly the same as stealing a citizen’s vote. JUST THE FACTS What does the evidence show? 1. Voter participation has been lower since the vote-by-mail system started, historic lows. This is counter to the claims made by those supporting vote-by-mail. 2. Based on the data from the state, the party in control flipped by enough margin to ensure consistent victories for the party implementing vote-by-mail. 3. Illegal aliens have been given entry into voting in our elections via DMV license and automatic voter registration. See Get a Driver License – Over 18 [See Paste] 4. The system doesn’t ensure a secure vote in any way. 5. The system is wide open to fraud, abuse, and theft. 6. Citizens are left with no insight, and no recourse. Paste (SAUCE) https://qanonbin.com/paste/0cgodEvWL

--Go ahead try yourself anons. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/143/giuffre-v-maxwell/ Wait. Did they screw up big on the Ghislaine Maxwell redactions? You can copy and paste the redacted pages into notepad and read them. h/t @NoRestrictions-- Post 10136707 3 hours ago • View on 8kun During her recent deposition, Defendant refused to answer numerous questions about allegedly “adult” sexual activity related to Jeffrey Epstein. Because this activity is highly relevant to this case, Defendant should be ordered to answer questions about it.As the Court is aware, this defamation case involves Ms. Giuffre’s assertions that she and other femaleswere recruited by Defendant to be sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein under the guise of being “massage therapists.” See Complaint, (DE1), at ¶ 27 (Giuffre “described Maxwell’s role as one of the main women who Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator and participant in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme”). In response to these assertions, Defendant has made the sweeping claim that Ms. Giuffre’s assertions are “entirely false” and “entirely untrue.” Complaint, DE 1, at ¶ 31 Yet during her deposition, Defendant refused to answer any questions that she construed as having something to do with “consensual adult sex.” Defense counsel supported that position that “frankly, [that’s] none of your business and I instruct the witness not to answer.” SeeDeclaration of Sigrid S. McCawley (“McCawley Decl.”)at Exhibit 1, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 21. The result was that at a number of points throughout her deposition, Defendant refused to answer questions aboutsubjects integral to this lawsuit, including questions about whatthe alleged “massage therapists” were doing at Jeffrey Epstein’s house and the sexual nature of those massages. For example, Defendantrefused to answer questions about whether she had given Jeffrey Epstein a massage:Q. Have you ever given Jeffrey Epsteina massage?MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the form,foundation. And I'm going to instructyou not to answer that question. Idon't have any problem with you askingquestions about what the subject matterof this lawsuit is, which would be, asyou've termed it, sexual trafficking ofMs. Roberts.To the extent you are asking forinformation relating to any consensualadult interaction between my client andMr. Epstein, I'm going to instruct hernot to answer because it's not part ofthis litigation and it is her privateconfidential information, not subject tothis deposition.MS. McCAWLEY: You can instruct hernot to answer. That is your right. ButI will bring her back for anotherdeposition because it is part of thesubject matter of this litigation so sheshould be answering these questions.This is civil litigation, deposition andshe should be responsible for answeringthese questions.MR. PAGLIUCA: I disagree and youunderstand the bounds that I put on it.MS. McCAWLEY: No, I don't. I willcontinue to ask my questions and you cancontinue to make your objections.Q. Did you ever participate from thetime period of 1992 to 2009, did you everparticipate in a massage with Jeffrey Epsteinand another female?MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection. Do notanswer that question. Again, to theextent you are asking for some sort ofillegal activity as you've construed in Post 10136709 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136707 connection with this case I don't haveany problem with you asking thatquestion. To the extent these questionsinvolve consensual acts between adults,frankly, they're none of your businessandI will instruct the witness not toanswer.MS. McCAWLEY: This case involvessexual trafficking, sexual abuse,questions about her having interactionswith other females is relevant to thiscase. She needs to answer thesequestions.MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm instructing hernot to answer.MS. McCAWLEY: Then we will be backhere again.SeeMcCawley Decl. at Exhibit 2, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 19-22 (emphasis added).Defendant’s participation in massages with Epstein is a central part of this case. Ms. Giuffre has explained that during her first sexual encounter with Jeffrey Epstein, it was Defendant who provided instructionon how to do it and how to turn the massage into a sexual event. Obviously, proof that Defendant hadpreviously massaged Epstein –include massages with sexual component –wouldprovide important corroboration for Ms. Giuffre’s testimony at trial. Andproofthat Defendantwasinvolved in massages will further help prove that statements to the press that Virginia’s allegations were “obvious lies”wasitself an obvious lie.As another example, Defendant refused to answer questions abouther knowledge that Johanna Sjoberg was hired to work for Epstein andprovidedmassages. In the police report, Johanna admitted that Maxwell recruited her to workfor Epstein. SeeMcCawley Decl. at Exhibit3, Giuffre000076-77(police report indicating that Johanna was recruited by Maxwell).Yet during Defendant’sdeposition, she refused to answer questions regarding Johanna Sjoberg.Q. Do you know what tasks Johanna was hired to performance?A. She was tasked to answer telephones.Q. Did you ever ask her to rub Jeffrey's feet?. . . A. Ibelieve that I have read that, but I don't have any memory of it. Q. Did you ever tell Johanna that she would get extra money if she provided Jeffrey massages?A. I was always happy to give career advice to people and I think that becoming somebody in the healthcare profession, either exercise instructor or nutritionist or professional massage therapist is an excellent job opportunity. Hourly wages are around 7, 8, $9 and as a professional healthcare provider you can earn somewhere between as we have established 100 to $200 and to be able to travel and have a job that pays that is a wonderful job opportunity. So in the context of advising people for opportunities for work, it is possible that I would have said that she should explore that as an option.Q. Did you tell her she would get extra money if she massaged Jeffrey?A. I'm just saying, I cannot recall the exact conversation. I give career advice and I have done that.Q. Did you ever have Johanna massage you?A. I did.Q. How many times?A. I don't recall how many times.Q. Was there sex involved?A. No.. . . Q. Did you ever have sexual contact with Johanna?MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the formand foundation. You need to give me anopportunity to get in between thequestions.Anything that involves consensualsex on your part, I'm instructing younot to answer.Q. Did you ever have sexual contactwith Johanna?A. [MR. PAGLIUCA?] Again, she is an adult –Q. I’m asking you, did you ever havesexual contact with Johanna?A. I’ve just been instructed not toanswer.Q. On what basis?A. You have to ask my lawyer.See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 4, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 60-62 (emphasis added). Post 10136713 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136709 5 Here again, this information is critical to the case. Among other things, these questions are designed to show a modus operani (“M.O”) for Epstein and Maxwell –specifically, how they recruited for a non-sexual massage than converted the massageinto sexual activities. One last illustration comes from Defendant’s refusal to answer about her knowledge of Epstein’s sexual interests during massages:Q. Does Jeffrey like to have his nipples pinched during sexual encounters?MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form and foundation.A. I'm not referring to any advice on my counsel. I'm not talking about any adult sexual things when I was with him.Q. When Jeffrey would have a massage, would he request that the masseuse pinch his nipples while he was having amassage?A. I'm not talking about anything with consensual adult situation.See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 5, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 82. While Epstein himself might also provide answers to these questions, it appears likely that he will assert his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding his sexual activities. Accordingly, Ms. Giuffre must pursue questioning of Maxwell to obtain information on this subject. Here again, information about Epstein’s sexual idiosyncrasies will provide important corroboration to Ms. Giuffre’s testimony that she had sexual interactions of an identical nature with Epstein. Theserefusalsare not an isolated instance. Instead, similar refusals to answer questions occurredrepeatedlythroughout the deposition. See, e.g., McCawley Decl. at CompositeExhibit 6.52-55; 64-65; 82; 92-93; 137-38; 307-09.The Court should compel Defendant to answer all these questions.In addition to the specific points made above, the “big picture” here reveals how vital such discovery is.At the core of Ms. Giuffre’s allegations is the allegation that Defendant luredherinto a sexual situation with the offer of a job making money as a massage therapist; that Epstein always habitually tried Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 143 Filed 05/05/16 Page 5 of 10 to turn massages into sex (that was his modus operandi and plan all along); and that Maxwell recruited other females for an ostensibly proper position, such as therapeutic masseuse, with knowledgethat the intent was for that person would be pressured to provide sexual gratification to Epstein. As a result, Epstein’s use of massages for sexual purposes is a central part of this case.And Defendant’srole in those massages –and knowledge of the purposes of those massages –is a critical piece of evidence showing her state of mind when she attacked Ms. Giuffre’s assertions as “entirely untrue.” Ms. Giuffre intends to prove at trial that Defendant knew full well the sexual purpose for which she was recruiting females –including underage females like Ms. Giuffre. Ms. Giuffre is entitled to explore Defendant’s knowledge of the sexual activities that took place under the guise of “massages.” Otherwise Defendant will be able to portray to the jury an inaccurate picture of that what was happening at Epstein’s house what nothing more than run-of-the-mill massage therapy. See, e.g., McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 7, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 51 (“Q: Did [the pay for massage therapists] vary on what sexual acts they performed? . . . A: No, it varied depending on how much time, some massage therapists charge more and some charge less.”).Defendant’s refusal to answer questions about alleged “adult” consensual sex also blocks Ms. Giuffre from seeking legitimate discovery in this case. By refusing to answer questions about her and Epstein’s sexual activities with alleged “adults,” Defendant is essentially given the ability to refuse to answer any sexual question she does not wish to answer. Defendant simply has to deem the question as involving “consensual adult sex” and no need be given. The result is to leave Ms. Giuffre with no way of exploring the identity of these alleged adults, the ages of these alleged adults, and indeed whether they were adults at all. This allows Defendant to claim Post 10136716 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136713 that she is unaware of any sexual activity involving underage females, because (she claims) the only sexual activity she was aware involved adults.The Court should compel Ms. Maxwell to answer all questions about her knowledge relating to sexual activities with Epstein and other females while at Epstein’s various homes.See Fed. R. Crim. P. 37(a)(3)(B)(i); see, e.g., Kelly v. A1 Tech., No. 09 CIV. 962 LAK MHD, 2010 WL 1541585, at *20 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2010) (“Under the Federal Rules, when a party refusesto answer a question during a deposition, the questioning party may subsequently move to compel disclosure of the testimony that it sought. The court must determine the propriety of the deponent's objection to answering the questions, and can order the deponent to provide improperly withheld answers during a continued deposition” (internal citations omitted)). Ofcourse, the party objecting to discovery must carry the burden of proving the validity of its objections, particularly in light of “the broad and liberal construction afforded the federal discovery rules . . . .” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books,LLC, 298 F.R.D. 184, 186 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). For purposes of a deposition, the information sought “need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 293 F.R.D. 557, 561 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1)).Defendant cannot carry her burden of showing that the questions asked are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.This is a case in which sexual activities lie at the heart of the issues in dispute. As a result, it is hardly surprising to find that discovery pertains to alleged “adult” sexual activities –and questions about such subjects are entirely proper.See, e.g.,Condit v. Dunne, 225 F.R.D. 100, 113 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (in defamation case, “Plaintiff is hereby ordered to answer questions regarding his sexual relationships in so far as they are relevant to a defense of substantial truth, mitigation of damages, or impeachment of plaintiff.”); Weber v. Multimedia Entm't, Inc., No. 97 CIV. 0682 PKL THK, 1997 WL 729039, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 1997) (“While discovery is not unlimited and may not unnecessarily intrude into private matters, in the instant case inquiry into private matters is clearly relevant to the subject matter of the suit. Accordingly, plaintiff Misty Weber shall respond to defendants' interrogatories concerning her sexual partners . . . .”).Generally speaking, instructions from attorneys to their clients not to answer questions at a deposition should be “limited to [issues regarding] privilege.” Morales v. Zondo, Inc., 204 F.R.D. 50, 54 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).In this case, defense counsel ranged far beyond the normal parameters of objections and sought to decide for himself what issues were relevant. That was improper and the Court should order a resumption of the Defendant’s deposition so that she can answer questions about her knowledge of sexual activity relating to Jeffrey Epstein.CONCLUSIONDefendant should be ordered to sit for a follow-up deposition and directed to answer questions regarding her knowledge of alleged “adult” sexual activity. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0_2.pdf Post 10136726 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136718 >>10136716 >https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0_2.pdf https://twitter.com/ShirtlessPundit/status/1289038498238877696 Post 10136754 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136726 Shirtless Pundit 🇺🇸 @ShirtlessPundit Level 1: Wait. Did they screw up big on the Ghislaine Maxwell redactions? You can copy and paste the redacted pages into notepad and read them. h/t @NoRestrictions Check out document #143 for a great example. https://twitter.com/ShirtlessPundit/status/1289038498238877696 Post 10136767 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136253 >>10136245 >>Is this real? >Yes. >>10136245 >>10136255 >>10136254 You can copy/Pasta the redactions on to the notepad program and words from the redactions show up. Go ahead try yourself anons. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/143/giuffre-v-maxwell/ Wait. Did they screw up big on the Ghislaine Maxwell redactions? You can copy and paste the redacted pages into notepad and read them. h/t @NoRestrictions Check out document #143 for a great example. CourtListener docs: https://bitly/2XaOtlK Or #143 https://mobile.twitter.com/ShirtlessPundit/status/1289038498238877696 NOTABLE For keks even if notable b4 Post 10136774 3 hours ago • View on 8kun >>10136762 >What's the source of the .pdf? these look legit, look at all this treasure https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc#entry-1090

... ”They get instructions from other users on what sedatives one should give children in order to abuse them. “A discussion ensues on which children can be abused.’’ Mr Beisenbach added he was shocked at what has been found. “I felt sick when I heard it but it has also made us more determined to pursue this inquiry,’’ he said. “I fear it is going to be more than 30,000 suspects.” read more https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/germany-uncovers-pedophile-ring-of-30000/news-story/a61ce8dadc01c368a979bf658e17a531

Post 10114830 3 hours ago • View on 8kun Activists push for investigation over claims China is forcibly harvesting organs of Uighur population For decades, the Chinese Communist Party depended on executed prisoners to bolster its organ transplant trade. Then it emerged that government leaders were relying on persecuted minorities to boost their bank. But despite claims that all harvested body parts now stem strictly from "voluntary" donors after death, human rights activists and international leaders are collecting evidence that the beleaguered Uighur Muslim community in Xinjiang province, also known as East Turkistan, could be the latest in a long line of state-sanctioned "victims" being killed for their hearts, lungs, liver, kidneys and other vital body parts – sometimes extracted from their bodies while still alive. Earlier this month, two Uighur activist organizations – the East Turkistan National Awakening Movement and the East Turkistan Government in Exile – filed a complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC) against the Beijing leadership, alleging that the top brass had committed genocide and crimes against humanity against the Uighurs, including the stealing of organs from the mostly Muslim Turkic ethnic group and urging an inquiry. https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-harvesting-organs-uighur-investigation