Date: May 28, 2025 Source: Special Report with Bret Baier – FOX News Subject: FBI Director Kash Patel: Interview from Quantico QUANTICO, VA – In a wide-ranging interview from the FBI Academy, newly appointed FBI Director Kash Patel sat down with Bret Baier to discuss his reform agenda, national security concerns, and high-profile investigations. The interview aired during Special Report on May 28, 2025. Below are the key takeaways: 🔹 FBI Reform and Recruitment • Applications Surge: The bureau is receiving 5,700 applications per month, signaling renewed public interest. • Facility Upgrades: Patel emphasized the need to modernize FBI Academy facilities and update training standards. 🔹 Operation Raptor – Fentanyl Interdiction • A global initiative across four continents is targeting fentanyl and precursor chemicals. • The FBI is coordinating with Treasury and State to sanction entities and negotiate diplomatically, particularly with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). • Patel notes China is now rerouting chemicals away from Mexico due to improved border enforcement. 🔹 Criticism of Former Leadership • Patel condemned former FBI leadership for politicizing the agency, failing in modernization, and blocking internal initiatives. • He vowed to restore strategic planning and transparency within the bureau. 🔹 Transparency on High-Profile Investigations • Patel confirmed the release of previously hidden documents to Congress and pledged full constitutional oversight. • He criticized the prior slow-walked acknowledgment of 26 confidential human sources present during the January 6 Capitol incident. 🔹 National Guard on January 6 • Patel asserted the Trump administration authorized the National Guard, but the deployment was rejected by Mayor Bowser and Speaker Pelosi. • He blamed millions in investigation costs on political posturing and media-driven narratives. 🔹 James Comey Controversy • Patel accused former Director Comey of triggering copycat threats by posting the code “8647” on social media—interpreted by some as a reference to political violence. • These threats forced FBI agents to divert resources away from drug and child exploitation cases. 🔹 Trump Assassination Attempt – Butler, PA • Patel confirmed that more details will be released, stating: “You’re going to know everything we know.” • He denied speculation of an inside job, acknowledging conspiracy rumors but reaffirming commitment to truth. 🔹 Pipe Bomber and Other Threats • He revealed new leads are emerging on the January 6 pipe bomber and noted his deputy will discuss them in an upcoming interview. • Investigations into threats against public officials, including assassination attempts, are ongoing. 🔹 FBI Headquarters to Stay in D.C. • Patel announced the FBI will remain in Washington D.C., relocating next to the Department of Justice. • He rejected earlier plans to move the HQ to Maryland or Virginia, citing the importance of daily DOJ access. 🔹 National Security Threats – CCP • Patel cited thousands of military-aged Chinese nationals entering the U.S. as a top national security concern. • Warned of the long-term risk to domestic security and recruitment. 🔹 Personal Leadership and Vision • Patel, a first-generation Indian-American, emphasized his commitment to diversity, accountability, and mission integrity. • He vowed to support whistleblowers and remove personnel who violate their oath. This interview marks a shift in tone and direction for the FBI under Patel’s leadership. His emphasis on accountability, national security, and law enforcement modernization sets the stage for internal restructuring and external scrutiny. For full coverage, watch the archived video here:

Anonymous  05/28/25 (Wed) 16:28:34                 0e9631 (10) No.23092640 Patrick Bet David Gives Solid P Diddy Recap May 27, 2025 | Sundance | CTH doesn’t follow the perverse Hollywood or entertainment industry debauchery much, there’s just a lot of evil inside the connections and factually it’s sick. The world of DC politics is filthy enough, we don’t need the sexual perversions of Hollywood and the music industry in our review cycle. That said, I was sent this really good recap of the Sean Combs case by someone and Patrick Bet David gives a great 20-minute fact-filled summary of both the background and the current case. I found it interesting because PBD starts with the money aspect, then weaves the timeline while remaining focused on the money dynamic. It is well worth 20 minutes, and you will likely hear some things within his research notes you may not have known before. WATCH: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/05/27/patrick-bet-david-gives-solid-p-diddy-recap/ “Pissed off the Wrong People” - Who Taught Diddy Everything He Knows?

President Trump and the First Lady Participate in a Celebration of Military Mothers https://rumble.com/v6t4owr-president-trump-and-the-first-lady-participate-in-a-celebration-of-military.html?mref=25xjr&mc=3sy7v A Celebration of Service: Honoring America’s Veterans and Their Families On a beautiful spring day at the White House, President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump hosted a moving tribute in honor of America’s military mothers. The event, filled with warmth and patriotic pride, was more than a celebration of Mother’s Day—it was a heartfelt acknowledgment of the families who serve alongside our veterans, often in quiet strength and unwavering sacrifice. A Commander’s Gratitude President Trump opened the event by welcoming guests and highlighting some of his administration’s achievements, including new trade deals and economic progress. Yet, his focus quickly shifted to what he called the “most important” attendees in the room: America’s military mothers. “All of our American service members are heroes,” the President said, “and our military mothers are doubly so.” His remarks reflected a deep respect for the women who raise children while enduring the trials of military life—long deployments, missed birthdays, and constant uncertainty. President Trump emphasized that these women don’t just support service members; they build them, shaping the strength and values that carry into military service. He recognized service families from all branches—Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, and Space Force—affirming their place at the heart of America’s defense. In a proud reflection on military readiness, he noted a surge in enlistments, attributing it to a renewed sense of national pride and patriotism. “As your Commander-in-Chief, let me take this opportunity to salute you and to thank you on behalf of every single American,” he stated. It was a powerful declaration of appreciation from the nation’s highest office, spoken with sincerity and patriotic resolve. The First Lady’s Voice of Strength First Lady Melania Trump took the podium with grace and composure, delivering a message that resonated deeply with the families gathered in the room. Reflecting on motherhood, she described it as both an invincible strength and a vulnerable calling. Her words captured the emotional weight that military mothers bear—their unique journey filled with personal sacrifice, determination, and profound resilience. “Military mothers and America together have developed an extraordinary parallel journey,” she said. Her remarks painted a picture of women who navigate the complexities of life with courage, whether sending a child to boot camp or stepping into the role of caregiver later in life. She encouraged women to nurture themselves as well as their families, recognizing that their strength is foundational to the strength of the nation. “By caring for ourselves, we empower the next generation to thrive,” she affirmed. It was a powerful reminder that self-care is not a luxury—it is a patriotic duty for those who hold families together. Her speech culminated in a call to unity and hope, declaring that “a mother’s love and wisdom empower our children to flourish,” and urging all present to build a legacy of compassion and resilience. A Unified Message Together, the President and First Lady delivered a message that reflected the heart of the American spirit: service, family, and love of country. Their speeches complemented each other—one focused on national pride and public service, the other on personal sacrifice and the quiet heroism of mothers. But both carried the same core message: that America’s strength is built not only on the battlefield but also in the homes of those who serve. Their appreciation for military families was clear and sincere. By honoring mothers—those who raise, support, and sometimes grieve for those in uniform—the White House sent a message that the sacrifices of service are shared across generations and family lines. A Nation That Remembers Events like this one serve as powerful reminders that veterans do not serve alone. Behind every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine, or guardian is a family who sacrifices too. The courage and resilience of military mothers is a cornerstone of the American military tradition. They represent a silent force behind the uniform—raising children to love their country, endure hardship, and stand for something greater than themselves. As we move forward as a nation, let this celebration be more than a memory. Let it inspire us to support our military families not only with words, but with action, resources, and respect. Let it call us to recognize that behind every salute is a story of love, service, and devotion to country. In honoring our veterans and their families, we honor the best of what it means to be American. Their strength is our strength. Their sacrifice is our liberty. Their love of country is our inspiration. Happy Mother’s Day, and God bless America.

President Trump Participates in a Bilateral Meeting with the Prime Minister of Canada, May 6, 2025 President Trump Sets the Tone in First White House Meeting with Canada’s New Prime Minister May 6, 2025 | Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump welcomed newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to the White House on Tuesday in what was both a warm diplomatic encounter and a clear demonstration of leadership from the U.S. side. While the event was officially billed as a bilateral meeting between allies, it became evident that Trump remains the dominant figure in North American and global politics—confidently guiding the conversation and setting the priorities for discussion. A Strong Welcome—With Perspective President Trump began by congratulating Prime Minister Carney on a hard-fought electoral victory. While he noted that Carney’s party had been trailing prior to the election, Trump framed the win as a testament to resilience and strategy. He didn’t hesitate to add his own perspective, suggesting that his support and visibility may have played a part in the turnaround. It was classic Trump—honest, assertive, and unfiltered. Carney, for his part, was gracious and complimentary. He praised Trump’s focus on American workers, border security, and efforts to combat the fentanyl crisis—echoing many of the same priorities for his own administration in Canada. The alignment in policy goals suggests a promising working relationship ahead. Real Results: A Houthi Ceasefire One of the biggest takeaways from the meeting was Trump’s announcement regarding the Houthi rebels. According to the President, the group has communicated a desire to cease attacks on commercial shipping lanes, and the U.S. will immediately halt airstrikes in response. This is a major development in global maritime security, and Trump’s decisive handling of it reflects his long-standing commitment to peace through strength. While Prime Minister Carney acknowledged the significance of the news, Trump’s leadership in brokering the change made clear which country is driving international diplomacy at this moment. Trade, Sovereignty, and Firm Expectations Trump reaffirmed his commitment to fair trade, emphasizing that while USMCA had served its purpose in replacing the disastrous NAFTA deal, future trade arrangements must favor American production. He declined to commit to lifting tariffs on Canadian goods, stating that too often, the U.S. had subsidized foreign economies at the expense of its own workers. When asked directly if Canada could change his mind about tariffs, Trump answered, “No. Just the way it is.” It was a clear signal that the U.S. will continue to put American interests first—something his base and many economists argue is long overdue. Carney Echoes Trump’s Priorities Prime Minister Carney outlined a policy agenda that strongly mirrors President Trump’s: economic development, border security, Arctic defense, and a renewed focus on national sovereignty. Far from challenging Trump’s positions, Carney seemed eager to align with them—a practical move for a new leader seeking cooperation with America’s dominant economic and military partner. FWlIy.caa.mp4 A Historic Perspective In a lighter moment, Trump made a geographical observation about the U.S.-Canada border, joking that the two nations were “meant to be” together. While clearly tongue-in-cheek, the comment reflected Trump’s belief in shared heritage and mutual strength between the two countries. Carney responded with a standard assertion of sovereignty, but the mood remained friendly. Trump also noted the strength of U.S. military exports, America’s unmatched natural resources, and the surge in domestic investment triggered by his policies, particularly tariffs and strategic trade enforcement. He reminded the press that under his leadership, U.S. manufacturing and tech sectors are growing at historic rates. The bilateral meeting between President Trump and Prime Minister Carney was not just a diplomatic formality—it was a reminder of Trump’s enduring influence in shaping the North American agenda. With major developments in the Middle East, firm trade policy, and a renewed focus on sovereignty and economic self-reliance, Trump once again proved why his leadership continues to resonate both at home and abroad.

Rudy Giuliani @MayorRudyGiuliani Watch this explosive interview from 5 years ago. youtu.be/eKDYhb3kaMk https://truthsocial.com/@MayorRudyGiuliani/114445776431010733 Common Sense Ep. 3 The Trial: Witness One | EXCLUSIVE interview with Viktor Shokin The Shokin Testimony: Revisiting the Biden-Burisma Allegations Through the Eyes of Ukraine’s Ousted Prosecutor In the third episode of Common Sense, hosted by Rudy Giuliani, the American public is presented with what is claimed to be the foundational witness testimony in a political corruption case that implicates the highest levels of U.S. government power—specifically, former Vice President Joe Biden. The featured interview with Viktor Shokin, the former Prosecutor General of Ukraine, is framed as the first step in what Giuliani characterizes as a legitimate trial of facts—juxtaposed against the “phony” impeachment proceedings pursued by the U.S. House of Representatives during the Trump administration. This episode, titled The Trial: Witness One, accuses Joe Biden of exerting pressure on the Ukrainian government to fire Shokin in order to shield his son, Hunter Biden, from criminal investigation related to his board membership at the Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings. The presentation suggests that this action constitutes bribery and corruption, laying out a timeline, supporting documents, and first-hand testimony that calls into question both Biden’s integrity and the media’s portrayal of the events. Historical Framing and Political Contrast The episode opens by referencing Thomas Paine’s Common Sense—a cornerstone of American revolutionary thought—and draws a thematic comparison between today’s political unrest and the ideological clarity sought during the nation’s founding. Giuliani emphasizes that this investigation is not merely political theater but a response to what he views as an actual abuse of power, in contrast to the "non-crimes" that were central to impeachment efforts against President Trump. This rhetorical positioning is intended to establish credibility for the program while discrediting mainstream narratives that dismiss the Burisma scandal as "debunked" or "old news." The Alleged Scheme: From Burisma to Biden The episode lays out the core allegation: that Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, funneled substantial wealth out of Ukraine through illicit licenses and offshore laundering, and then leveraged the political power of the U.S. Vice President to protect those operations. Zlochevsky allegedly awarded his own company lucrative gas exploration rights while serving as Ukraine’s Minister of Ecology, a blatant conflict of interest. The money trail reportedly stretches from Ukraine to Cyprus and other offshore havens. The crux of the bribery allegation lies in the assertion that Joe Biden used a $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee as leverage to force the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin, who was actively investigating Burisma and its board members—including Hunter Biden and his business associate Devon Archer. Giuliani notes that Biden openly bragged about this action during a 2018 Council on Foreign Relations panel, a moment widely cited by critics and defenders alike. Viktor Shokin’s Testimony Biden at CFR admiting to Quid Pro Quo.mp4 Appearing via recorded Skype interview, Viktor Shokin explains that his office was pursuing five separate cases involving Burisma, including charges of abuse of power, money laundering, and illegal enrichment. He testifies that Biden’s intervention derailed these efforts just as his team was beginning to gather actionable evidence. Shokin claims that his termination was explicitly linked to U.S. demands, conveyed through Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. The episode includes discussion of a Latvian government report that allegedly documents a money-laundering scheme involving Hunter Biden and Devon Archer. Giuliani asserts that the U.S. Embassy pressured Ukrainian officials not to disclose the amounts Hunter Biden received, furthering the narrative of an orchestrated cover-up. The Timeline: Why February 2016 Matters A central argument is built around February 2016—a month in which Shokin claims the investigation reached a critical point. Court-ordered asset seizures were initiated against Burisma. Biden reportedly made three urgent calls to President Poroshenko. Soon after, Shokin was dismissed from his post. These facts are presented to imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship: that Biden’s pressure was not policy-driven reform, but an effort to obstruct justice. Questions of Qualification and Intent Another key element involves the credibility—or lack thereof—of Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma. Shokin asserts that Hunter had no relevant experience in energy or Eastern Europe, and that his past issues with substance abuse were well known. Giuliani and Shokin imply that Hunter's board appointment was made solely to curry favor with his politically powerful father. The testimony raises concerns not only about corruption, but about the systemic failure to address these issues in Washington or the press. Giuliani accuses the State Department and major media outlets of suppressing information, citing unnamed conversations, documents, and embassy interference. Legal Status and Character Assassination To bolster Shokin’s credibility, Giuliani presents official certificates from Ukrainian anti-corruption agencies attesting that Shokin has no criminal record or standing charges against him. He also criticizes Western media portrayals of Shokin as corrupt, labeling such characterizations as unfounded and politically motivated. The episode closes by previewing further developments in the so-called trial, including claims that Shokin was later poisoned with mercury—a possible assassination attempt. Giuliani calls this saga a “vast conspiracy” and promises more damning revelations in future installments. Conclusion: What This Means for Accountability The episode makes a strong case that a comprehensive and independent investigation into Biden’s Ukraine dealings is warranted. Regardless of political affiliation, the evidence presented—if authentic—raises serious concerns about abuse of office, foreign influence, and the suppression of justice. The inclusion of firsthand testimony, financial records, and diplomatic timelines adds weight to an issue many in the media and political establishment have dismissed. If these allegations are true, they represent a failure of not only one administration, but of the U.S. political system to hold its leaders accountable. If false, then this entire narrative is an elaborate smear campaign with significant consequences for public trust and national unity. Either way, the American public deserves transparency—and that begins with open discussion and critical examination of the facts. Devon Archer Shokin