Rudy Giuliani

@MayorRudyGiuliani

Watch this explosive interview from 5 years ago. youtu.be/eKDYhb3kaMk

https://truthsocial.com/@MayorRudyGiuliani/114445776431010733

The Shokin Testimony: Revisiting the Biden-Burisma Allegations Through the Eyes of Ukraine’s Ousted Prosecutor

In the third episode of Common Sense, hosted by Rudy Giuliani, the American public is presented with what is claimed to be the foundational witness testimony in a political corruption case that implicates the highest levels of U.S. government power—specifically, former Vice President Joe Biden. The featured interview with Viktor Shokin, the former Prosecutor General of Ukraine, is framed as the first step in what Giuliani characterizes as a legitimate trial of facts—juxtaposed against the “phony” impeachment proceedings pursued by the U.S. House of Representatives during the Trump administration.

This episode, titled The Trial: Witness One, accuses Joe Biden of exerting pressure on the Ukrainian government to fire Shokin in order to shield his son, Hunter Biden, from criminal investigation related to his board membership at the Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings. The presentation suggests that this action constitutes bribery and corruption, laying out a timeline, supporting documents, and first-hand testimony that calls into question both Biden’s integrity and the media’s portrayal of the events.

Historical Framing and Political Contrast

The episode opens by referencing Thomas Paine’s Common Sense—a cornerstone of American revolutionary thought—and draws a thematic comparison between today’s political unrest and the ideological clarity sought during the nation’s founding. Giuliani emphasizes that this investigation is not merely political theater but a response to what he views as an actual abuse of power, in contrast to the "non-crimes" that were central to impeachment efforts against President Trump.

This rhetorical positioning is intended to establish credibility for the program while discrediting mainstream narratives that dismiss the Burisma scandal as "debunked" or "old news."

The Alleged Scheme: From Burisma to Biden

The episode lays out the core allegation: that Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, funneled substantial wealth out of Ukraine through illicit licenses and offshore laundering, and then leveraged the political power of the U.S. Vice President to protect those operations. Zlochevsky allegedly awarded his own company lucrative gas exploration rights while serving as Ukraine’s Minister of Ecology, a blatant conflict of interest. The money trail reportedly stretches from Ukraine to Cyprus and other offshore havens.

The crux of the bribery allegation lies in the assertion that Joe Biden used a $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee as leverage to force the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin, who was actively investigating Burisma and its board members—including Hunter Biden and his business associate Devon Archer. Giuliani notes that Biden openly bragged about this action during a 2018 Council on Foreign Relations panel, a moment widely cited by critics and defenders alike.

Viktor Shokin’s Testimony

Appearing via recorded Skype interview, Viktor Shokin explains that his office was pursuing five separate cases involving Burisma, including charges of abuse of power, money laundering, and illegal enrichment. He testifies that Biden’s intervention derailed these efforts just as his team was beginning to gather actionable evidence. Shokin claims that his termination was explicitly linked to U.S. demands, conveyed through Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.

The episode includes discussion of a Latvian government report that allegedly documents a money-laundering scheme involving Hunter Biden and Devon Archer. Giuliani asserts that the U.S. Embassy pressured Ukrainian officials not to disclose the amounts Hunter Biden received, furthering the narrative of an orchestrated cover-up.

The Timeline: Why February 2016 Matters

A central argument is built around February 2016—a month in which Shokin claims the investigation reached a critical point. Court-ordered asset seizures were initiated against Burisma. Biden reportedly made three urgent calls to President Poroshenko. Soon after, Shokin was dismissed from his post. These facts are presented to imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship: that Biden’s pressure was not policy-driven reform, but an effort to obstruct justice.

Questions of Qualification and Intent

Another key element involves the credibility—or lack thereof—of Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma. Shokin asserts that Hunter had no relevant experience in energy or Eastern Europe, and that his past issues with substance abuse were well known. Giuliani and Shokin imply that Hunter's board appointment was made solely to curry favor with his politically powerful father.

The testimony raises concerns not only about corruption, but about the systemic failure to address these issues in Washington or the press. Giuliani accuses the State Department and major media outlets of suppressing information, citing unnamed conversations, documents, and embassy interference.

Legal Status and Character Assassination

To bolster Shokin’s credibility, Giuliani presents official certificates from Ukrainian anti-corruption agencies attesting that Shokin has no criminal record or standing charges against him. He also criticizes Western media portrayals of Shokin as corrupt, labeling such characterizations as unfounded and politically motivated.

The episode closes by previewing further developments in the so-called trial, including claims that Shokin was later poisoned with mercury—a possible assassination attempt. Giuliani calls this saga a “vast conspiracy” and promises more damning revelations in future installments.

Conclusion: What This Means for Accountability

The episode makes a strong case that a comprehensive and independent investigation into Biden’s Ukraine dealings is warranted. Regardless of political affiliation, the evidence presented—if authentic—raises serious concerns about abuse of office, foreign influence, and the suppression of justice. The inclusion of firsthand testimony, financial records, and diplomatic timelines adds weight to an issue many in the media and political establishment have dismissed.

If these allegations are true, they represent a failure of not only one administration, but of the U.S. political system to hold its leaders accountable. If false, then this entire narrative is an elaborate smear campaign with significant consequences for public trust and national unity.

Either way, the American public deserves transparency—and that begins with open discussion and critical examination of the facts.

Devon Archer

Shokin