Maricopa to Fulton, ballots and fraud (Runbeck)

Post 62882 5 hours ago • View on 8kun

KanekoaTheGreat, [14.06.21 09:42] [Forwarded from Arizona Audit Watch Channel] f Fulton County Georgia Election Official Admits Legally Required Chain of Custody Documentation Is Missing from 24% of Ballots from 2020 Election — Or 1 in 4 Ballots! - The total number of absentee ballots whose chain of custody was purportedly documented in these 385 missing Fulton County absentee ballot transfer forms was 18,901 (https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/06/13/chain-of-custody-documents-view-all-the-ballot-transfer-forms-from-the-november-2020-election-provided-by-fulton-county-to-the-georgia-star-news/), more than 6,000 votes greater than the less than 12,000 vote margin of Biden’s certified victory in the state. - To date, The Star News has obtained absentee ballot drop box forms from 59 counties that provide chain of custody documentation for 266,492 absentee ballots (https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/05/18/georgia-still-has-not-produced-chain-of-custody-records-for-333000-absentee-vote-by-mail-ballots-deposited-in-drop-boxes/) deposited in drop boxes during the November 3, 2020 election, which means that no chain of custody documentation has been produced for about 333,000 absentee ballots (https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/05/18/georgia-still-has-not-produced-chain-of-custody-records-for-333000-absentee-vote-by-mail-ballots-deposited-in-drop-boxes/) deposited in drop boxes out of an estimated 600,000 (https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/05/18/georgia-still-has-not-produced-chain-of-custody-records-for-333000-absentee-vote-by-mail-ballots-deposited-in-drop-boxes/) absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes during that election. 🔗 (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/georgias-fulton-county-election-official-admits-legally-required-chain-custody-documentation-missing/)Full Article (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/georgias-fulton-county-election-official-admits-legally-required-chain-custody-documentation-missing/)

Chain of Custody forms for nearly 25% of ballots from Fulton County Georgia drop boxes are not accounted for That constitutes over 18,000 ballots with missing, legally-required documentation Audit everything. https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1404463991229980677?s=20

Who Printed Ballots for Fulton County, GA and Why Is It Important?

https://cleverjourneys.com/2021/06/10/who-printed-ballots-for-fulton-county-ga-and-why-is-it-important/

Post 62902 4 hours ago • View on 8kun

>>62882 1/3 Who Printed Ballots for Fulton County, GA and Why Is It Important? BYTEXANS JACK & DODIEON JUNE 10, 2021 • Even Democrat Election Observers Provided Sworn Affidavits: Cheating Rampant for Biden Ballots Who Are Kevin and Brian Runbeck? Democrat Judge Orders Audit Kevin Runbeck (Runbeck Election Services) Where did thousands of mail-in ballots in prestine condition in Fulton County, Georgia suddenly come from during the 2020 presidential election? They were printed by Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix, Arizona, but there is something very suspicious about these particular ballots. Who filed a U.S. Patent Application for a computer system for “on-screen ballot duplication” to be used for “generating a revised ballot”? According to application # 20190311030, Kevin Runbeck does: The first time I heard the name “Kevin Runbeck” was last month in an Original Pancake House nestled next to a Lazy Boy store near the Scottsdale, Arizona Fashion Mall during breakfast. The server sat me at a small table facing an empty booth next to the front picture windows. Within seconds she sat a man down on the right booth bench directly in my view. He looked at me and I shrugged, “Awkward.” He laughed, “So much for six feet of social distancing. That’s OK, the man I’m meeting here is so loud you can here him if they set you 30 feet away.” About that time his loud friend walked in the front door and joined him. His name was Don or Dan (I’ll call him Don). He was tall and wore a straw cowboy hat. His voice, indeed, was at least as loud and noticeable as Slim Pickens or Chill Wills. I wasn’t being nosy, but it was impossible not to learn a great about Don’s thoughts and opinions. The first man, more fit and mild, was Greg. Both appeared to be in their sixties. By a good ten minutes into their conversation, I determined Don was originally from Georgia, spent some time in Texas and had now been living in Phoenix for at least a decade Judge Brian Amero Meanwhile, back in Georgia, Superior Court Judge Brian Amero granted a forensics review of the 147,000 mail-in ballots cast in the Nov. 3, 2020 presidential election. The judge approved the audit. After reading a lawsuit that could prove fraudulent ballots and other irregularities led to Joe Biden’s 2020 win in Georgia, the Democrat controlled Fulton County immediately hired criminal defense attorneys to fight the lawsuit, resulting in a temporarily block of the audit. When my breakfast plate arrived, I tried to pay little attention to loud Don, but when he said, “It sounds like one of these Hunter Biden deals…”, I perked up. Don was telling Greg about the Kevin Redbeck, Chairman and owner of Redbeck Election Services. He mentioned Brian Redbeck: “You won’t even see Brian’s name listed on their website, but he’s in on it too.” (I wrote this quote on my napkin as a reminder to check into it.) “They print these election ballots right here (Phoenix) that go all over the country, even back home in Georgia,” Don stated. “They’ll likely find them turning up here in Maricopa (County) too. Brian and Jim’s names could be all over this.” Two weeks later I’m back home in Texas reading my email and the subject of Kevin Redbeck pops up from a CleverJourneys reader. He’s an intelligent man, very keen when it comes to politics. Serindipty kicked in, I thought, because that’s the same name I heard in Flagstaff. The emails continued: Brian Runbeck identifies himself as the Client Services Manager/Project Manager and Production Coordinator at Runbeck Election Services, saying he manages the production of election ballots and related official election material. He claims he handles high pressure deadlines and high volume production. Stunningly, government records indicate Brian Runbeck was a prolific monetary contributor (over 50 times in 2020) to Act Blue, Biden for President and the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee. Cowboy Don at the Scottsdale pancake house was right. Brian Redbuck is not mentioned on Redbuck Election Services website. There is a list of thumbnails bios and pictures of executives and leaders, but nothing–zero, nada–on Brian. But there is a Jim. Now this might not be the Jim the two men in the Scottsdale restaurant were talking about, however Jim Suver is listed on Redbeck Election Services’ website as Vice President of Business Services. Jim Suver. Kevin Runbeck. “Jim leads Runbeck’s business development and strategic growth initiatives in all states and specific partner counties. He is also responsible for developing and maintaining strong governmental relationships. In the U.S. elections space, Jim is well-known for establishing and finding value in previously untapped markets. Jim has managed Runbeck’s expansion to 18 states and Washington DC.”

Post 62903 4 hours ago • View on 8kun

2/3 Jim Suver. Kevin Runbeck. “Jim leads Runbeck’s business development and strategic growth initiatives in all states and specific partner counties. He is also responsible for developing and maintaining strong governmental relationships. In the U.S. elections space, Jim is well-known for establishing and finding value in previously untapped markets. Jim has managed Runbeck’s expansion to 18 states and Washington DC.” Georgia Sworn Affidavits Judge Amero is a Democratic donor, but sworn affidavits from actual election monitors compelled him to ordered the ballot reviews. According RealClearInvestigations, (RCI) Fulton County poll manager Suzi Voyles testified she saw ballots marked for Joe Biden were suspiciously pristine and uniform while she was sorting through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November. When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they’d been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil. Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes. In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine. “All of them were strangely pristine,” said Voyles, who said she’d never seen anything like it in her 20 years monitoring elections in Fulton County, which includes much of Atlanta. More poll workers in Fulton County swore in affidavits that they also observed fake-looking ballots in stacks of absentee ballots for Biden. Robin Hall, a certified Fulton County recount observer, also testified she witnessed a number of boxes of absentee ballots marked “100% for Biden” that appeared to be “perfectly filled out as if they were pre-printed with the presidential candidate selected.” She stated: “They did not look like a person had filled this out at home. All of them looked alike.” Judy Aube also worked at the World Congress Center on Nov. 14 where she observed the same thing: “suspicious batches” of mail-in ballots for Biden whose markings appeared identical, as if they had been duplicated by a machine and not filled out by a voter at home. Barbara Hartman, another election official auditor, also doubted the authenticity of absentee ballots she handled that she said were never folded, as would normally be the case for ballots returned in an envelope by mail or dropped in a box. “The absentee ballots looked as though they had just come from a fresh stack,” she swore in her affidavit. “I could not observe any creases in the ballots and [it] did not seem like they were folded and put into envelopes or mailed out.” Also, “The majority of the mail-in ballots that I reviewed contained suspicious black perfectly bubbled markings for Biden,” Hartman stated, adding that “they looked as if they were stamped.” Observers and follow up investigations noted that bar coding was missing from those ballots. Prominent Information Technology specialist Javon Pulitzer testified that Fulton County ballots in the general election for GOP precincts included a barcode while the ballots in Democrat districts did not include the barcode. The ballots shipped by Runbeck, were said to be already in the envelopes and were actually printed differently depending on the political leanings of the precincts.

Post 62904 4 hours ago • View on 8kun

3/3 RCI also reported: Carlos E. Silva, for one, declared in a Nov. 17 affidavit that he observed a similar “perfect black bubble” in absentee ballots for Biden during the recount he worked in DeKalb County. And while overseeing the Cobb County recount, he swore he “observed absentee ballots being reviewed with the same perfect bubble that I had seen the night before in DeKalb. All of these ballots had the same characteristics: they were all for Biden and had the same perfect bubble.” Added Silva, a registered Democrat: “There were thousands of [mail-in] ballots that just had the perfect bubble marked for Biden and no other markings in the rest of the ballot.” Another registered Democrat, Mayra Romera, testified that while monitoring the Cobb County recount, she noticed that “hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made … and all happened to be selections for Biden.” According to Georgia Secretary of State records, “Runbeck Election Services, Inc. is a Georgia Foreign Profit Corporation filed On April 6, 2020. The company’s filing status is listed as Active/Owes Current Year Ar and its File Number is 20049030…The company has 2 principals on record. The principals are Kevin Runbeck from Phoenix AZ and Robert Shepier from Phoenix AZ.” Brad Raffensperger was censured by Georgia GOP last week. Within two months, for the June 9, 2020 election primaries of Georgia, their Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger coordinated a deal with Runbeck Election Services who “partnered with Dominion Voting and the state of Georgia to send out more than one million absentee ballots.” During the 2016 general primary, only 37,000 absentee ballots were submitted by mail. 200,000 were submitted for the November 2016 general election, just one fifth of the total had on the June 9 election date. The surge was a result of Raffensperger’s office sending absentee ballot request forms to all of Georgia’s 6.9 million active voters. Raffensperger’s own press released revealed, “Instead of leaving the sending of absentee ballot request forms to local elections offices or third party organizations, the Secretary of State’s office took on that responsibility, coordinating with experienced state vendors for the printing and mailing of the request forms.” “The Secretary of State’s office also contracted with outside mail vendors for the fulfillment of the absentee ballot requests, including the provision of processing equipment and printing and mailing ballots, to take that burden off of local elections officials.“ “The Secretary of State is providing millions of dollars in grants to local elections offices for sanitation equipment, elections infrastructure, and other voting needs. One grant in particular is dedicated to equipment like drop boxes, which will make it easier for voters to return their absentee ballots and for local elections offices to accept them.“ One obvious question is why would Kevin Runbeck want a patent to generate revised ballots? I could understand revising ballots if candidates, dates, locations change prior to an election event and printing of ballots, but how would this prevent tampering, prefilled vote choices and fraud? Shipment of ballots from Runbeck to Atlanta discovered in investigation. Later the excuse was just in case something went https://cleverjourneys.com/2021/06/10/who-printed-ballots-for-fulton-county-ga-and-why-is-it-important/

Post 62905 4 hours ago • View on 8kun

>>62882 Why Did Ballots Scanned Offsite Continue to Be Delivered to Maricopa Elections Center After Voting Ended? BYTEXANS JACK & DODIEON JUNE 13, 2021 • ( 44 COMMENTS ) Part 2: The Runbeck Connection Thousands of mail-in ballots in pristine condition in Fulton County, Georgia suddenly showed up after the 2020 presidential election. The same scenario simultaneously occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona. They were printed by Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix, Arizona. This is the same company local media reported on regarding Rey Valenzuela, elections director, and Kevin Runbeck, owner of the printing company. Brian Runbeck, a significant employee, has been a prolific financial contributor to Democratic campaigns and causes, records show. Sworn Testimony When Rudy Giuliani and Arizona state legislatures held public hearings regarding the Maricopa County election fraud of November 2020, among the most compelling sworn testimonies came from elections witness Jan Bryant. Her testimony coincided with others and may explain Arizona audit director Ken Bennett’s later revelation that Dominion Voting Systems had refused to comply with a subpoena to turn over passwords to its Maricopa County voting machines. During the hearing on November 30, 2020, Bryant testified under oath that not even county IT staff were allowed access to the machines. Bryant witnessed Dominion employees with a laptop computer in the counting room during the six days she worked at the Maricopa County Election Center. During questioning by Republican state Rep. Mark Finchem, Bryant said there were daily election ballot deliveries to the center by Runbeck Election Services. According to witness testimony, these deliveries happened from Nov. 3 to at least Nov. 10. Repeated explanations by supervisors at that time was that “Runbeck has high speed scanners,” Bryant said. She was told the ballots were scanned offsite by Runbeck and then delivered to the Maricopa County Election Center. Transcript Quotes from Bryant’s testimony: Jan Bryant: …ten days before they quit tabulating they thought they were done. And then more truck loads of ballots would come in. And I’m like, how can you not know how many ballots are still out there. State House Rep. David L. Cook: Mr. Chairman I’m sorry. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT. They thought they were done, and then there was WHAT? Jan Bryant: They thought they were done multiple times. Multiple times the people that were running the rooms thought they were done (counting ballots), or almost done. Or were gonna be done Wednesday morning (Nov. 4th), then Thursday morning (Nov. 5th), then Friday morning. Then it went on the whole next week. And I’m like, I asked the question, You don’t know how many ballots are still left to come in? I don’t know who does, again…process…project management, but zero. 1/2

Post 62906 4 hours ago • View on 8kun

>>62905 AZ Reps: David L. Cook and Mark Finchem State House Rep. Mark Finchem: On that point Ma’am, I’m tracking with you but, what day did the truck show up? Jan Bryant: Every day, yeah, every day. Mark Finchem: OK. Just a minute. I want to make sure we capture this properly. So there were trucks that showed up on the 3rd, and then the 4th, and then the 5th, and how long did that go on. How many days? Jan Bryant: I wasn’t there the whole last week. My last day was the 10th and they were still coming in. They were coming from a company called Runbeck, that does the high speed scanning and printing of duplications, and I think the military ballots. And now I’m getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don’t know what they are doing but those ballots are coming in from a high speed scanning company called Runbeck that…. apparently you haven’t heard of Runbeck. Mark Finchem: No, I’ve heard of Runbeck Ma’am. What I’m trying to figure out is whether they printed them or if they scanned them. And if they scanned them offsite, to what purpose? Jan Bryant: I can’t tell you. Mark Finchem: Wasn’t that your job to scan them? I mean, not your job, but the (MCTEC). Jan Bryant: No, all the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck. So, those ballots go to Runbeck. As far as I know there were no observers there. I don’t know. I never got called to work at Runbeck. That’s all I can tell you. Mark Finchem: No that’s fine. Your observation is useful here. What you’re telling me is the scanning wasn’t actually done on site at a Maricopa County structure. It was done someplace else. Jan Bryant: Where they have very high speed scanners. Mark Finchem: Right now I really don’t care what the speed is. I want to know were they Dominion scanners? Jan Bryant: No, no, I don’t think it has anything to do with Dominion. Mark Finchem: I’m trying to understand what was the purpose of scanning them in advance of them being tabulated on the Dominion equipment. Jan Bryant: They were duplicate, duplications. The ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from Military and overseas. But there were more ballots than that. So I don’t know where the rest of them were coming from. Because they kept bringing trays of them in. So I don’t know where they were coming from. That’s a question for the county employees to explain to you, where those ballots came from that whole next week. I don’t know where they came from. Rudy Giuliani and Rep. Bret Roberts Rudy Giuliani: So you were there from Nov. 3rd through the 10th. Seven days later (after election) ballots were still coming in. Jan Bryant: Yes. Rudy Giuliani: Were those ballots counted? Jan Bryant: I watched them go through the tabulation machines. And I watched people working on the adjudication of those ballots. Rudy Giuliani: And how many ballots… Jan Bryant: Oh, I don’t know. Rudy Giuliani: What was the largest number you saw in one day. Just a guess. How many cartons? Jan Bryant: …there was usually 2 or 3 shifts. I wanna say one day they thought 90,000 was a good number, for a shift. And if they were running multiple shifts a day. It was somewhere between the 3rd and the 10th. State House Rep. Bret Roberts: I am assuming these were not early ballots in any way shape or form. I’m just kind of curious, did anything stand out to you as far as these new ballots, didn’t know where they were coming from, as far as a physical appearance in any way? Jan Bryant: No. Everything… they just looked like ballots. Just kept coming. They all came in the same bins. Runbeck: Democrat Financial Contributor Kevin Runbeck’s brother, Brian, although not listed on the website as an executive with the company, is an employee of Runbeck Election Services. He has also been a regular financial contributor to Democratic organizations, including Biden for President and Act Blue. https://cleverjourneys.wordpress.com/2021/06/13/why-did-ballots-scanned-offsite-continue-to-be-delivered-to-maricopa-elections-center-after-voting-ended/?preview=true 2/2