Mark Levin challenges legal dispute around Trump tariffs 📌 Full Summary of Levin's Argument on Trump Tariffs and the Constitution 🔷 Opening Context (00:00–01:18) Mark Levin opens the show with a brief mention of his guests but quickly transitions into the core topic: a legal battle over the constitutionality of tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. He frames the debate not as an economic issue, but as a constitutional question about the separation of powers. 🔷 Congressional Authority on Tariffs (01:18–03:17) Levin explains that under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress holds exclusive power to “lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises,” and regulate commerce with foreign nations. He references a federal trade court decision ruling that Trump's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs was unconstitutional. The court’s reasoning was that tariff authority is non-delegable and must remain with Congress. 🔷 The Trade Court’s Ruling (03:17–05:24) The Court of International Trade, a body with life-appointed judges created by Congress, ruled 3–0 against Trump’s tariffs. It held that Trump’s actions exceeded the limits of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).The judges argued that Trump’s retaliatory tariffs lacked the "unusual and extraordinary threat" required by the IEEPA and were therefore beyond statutory and constitutional authority. The court used the Federalist Papers and the non-delegation doctrine to support its decision. 🔷 Emergency Powers and Their Use (05:24–06:35) Levin reviews the 1977 IEEPA statute, specifically 50 U.S. Code §1701–1702, which allows the president to act during a declared national emergency when a significant foreign threat exists. Trump used this authority to apply global tariffs in response to perceived economic threats. Levin admits the move might stretch the statute's intent but defends it as still within the legal framework passed by Congress. 🔷 Appellate Court Response (06:35–07:01) Shortly after the trade court’s ruling, an appellate court issued a temporary stay on the enforcement of the lower court’s decision. The cases were consolidated, and Trump’s tariffs remain in effect pending further review. 🔷 Levin's Core Argument: No Separation of Powers Dispute Exists (07:01–08:58) Levin states the entire dispute hinges on a supposed separation of powers conflict—whether Congress improperly delegated power to the executive. But he emphasizes a key fact: Congress is not a party to the lawsuit. Only private litigants brought the suit. Levin argues that if Congress felt its constitutional powers had been usurped, it could have intervened. Congress hasn’t passed any law challenging Trump's tariffs, hasn’t joined the suit, and hasn’t even voiced opposition in a unified manner. He calls the plaintiffs’ argument illegitimate because they are attempting to enforce congressional authority that Congress itself has declined to assert. 🔷 The Role and Limits of the Trade Court (08:58–13:27) Levin questions the legitimacy of the trade court’s involvement. He argues that: • The trade court was created by Congress and has no constitutional authority on its own. • Judicial review is not explicitly in the Constitution and was claimed through precedent (Marbury v. Madison, 1803). • Because Congress passed the 1977 law and hasn't challenged Trump’s use of it, the trade court has no basis to override the executive branch. He sees this as a case of judicial overreach, where a court acts unilaterally without a genuine constitutional dispute between the other two branches. 🔷 Historical Overreach and Judicial Supremacy (13:27–15:58) Levin critiques the doctrine of judicial supremacy, tracing it back to Chief Justice Marshall’s Marbury v. Madison. He asserts that this decision created a precedent for the courts to assume powers not explicitly granted in the Constitution. He warns that this case is part of a broader trend in which the judiciary overrides both elected branches, despite lacking electoral accountability or checks and balances. Levin contends that judicial power has grown beyond what the framers intended. 🔷 Final Constitutional Critique (15:58–18:06) Levin concludes that: • Whether one supports tariffs or not, the Constitution is clear that Congress holds tariff authority. • However, since Congress passed the IEEPA and hasn’t reined in the President’s use of it, the court should not substitute its interpretation over Congress’s inaction. • The problem isn’t the President or Congress—it’s the judges who have seized power to make constitutional judgments in areas where no conflict between the branches exists. 🔷 Closing Warning (18:06–18:31) Levin ends with a warning: tyranny can arise in any branch of government, including the judiciary. He calls for law schools, lawyers, and judges to return to a proper understanding of constitutional limits, particularly the original balance of power among the branches. He urges viewers to care more about constitutional structure than policy preferences like support or opposition to tariffs. ✅ Conclusion: Levin’s central thesis is that the trade court’s intervention violates constitutional limits because Congress hasn’t acted to defend its own powers. He sees the judiciary as overstepping its role and calls for a restoration of original constitutional governance, where only elected officials can check each other, and courts do not act on policy disagreements without standing from another branch. Let me know if you want a visual aid, press release version, or an academic-style abstract of this summary.

Anonymous01/24/22 (Mon) 17:32:151013fb (1)No.15452056 I think she is my new fav! KEK

Anonymous 01/27/22 (Thu) 14:51:51 539b96 (6) No.15476555 Biblical <—- Q told us it's going to be Biblical, The Great Awaking will be Biblical, but what did Q Mean? You have to take a higher up view, 40K view. Do a DuckDuckGo search for "The Great Awaking" and look for explications of the basis of past Great Awaking's, No, this is not the 1st. Here is just one https://www.thearda.com/timeline/events/event_324.asp Q told us to Pray, unite, wake the sleepers, WWG1WGA and more, we were being trained and sent out on a mission, to help change the world. So how do we do that? How can we help usher in a Biblical Great Awaking? Through Love, living it and spreading it. Watch this short clip. See the 40K view, understand it. Do what God placed us here for! You do understand God placed us here, now, during these days for what he placed in each one of us, don't you? ;-) God Bless you all Patriots! We ARE part of God's Plan!!! WWG1WGA I always liked this video as well https://qanon.pub/?q=how%20many%20coin#2453

Anonymous 12/20/22 (Tue) 21:37:53 d0e979 (2) No.17989786

For it is believing in your heart that you are made right with God, and it is by openly declaring your faith that you are saved. - Romans 10:10

Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 17:27:33 1bad06 (12) No.15424278 Song Dedicated to Donald Trump— “My Way— by Sinatra 🍿🇺🇸 Jan 19 2022 9:11p ET #Marker - Dan Scavino Jr for 45 🎶 And Now, The End Is Near Dan Scavino Jr on FBook https://fb.watch/aEH92qybvH/ Sounds a lot like winning

Anonymous 07/11/23 (Tue) 22:08:06 ceff3b (5) No.19164260 ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANO GIVES THE WORLD A WARNING.  

Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 15:20:22 f46399 (11) No.15423529 I'm not claiming that this is what will happen. To most anons, the fact that we've been at infiltrated has been apparent for decades. I've had my mind set on moving towards 2022 and 2024 elections to take it back, but should these dots align and hold some truth, I will be forever greatful. I do recommend your personal preparedness. Make efforts to have a few weeks of emergency supplies on hand. Once we break through to the other side of this there will be periods of unrest and chaos in locations. Do not be afraid, be prepared. https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22strike+like%22 Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 15:39:54 7677ab (2) No.15423672 >>15423571 “If you look at 11.3 in the DOD manual you see they talk about GC. Trump does everything by the book. You may not like it but in order for us to get to the finish line we must play by the rules set down for us. If we break GC code we risk the globalists getting involved using NATO. Remember we are also at war with the globalists and they would not hesitate to get involved if given a reason. “The DOD Law of War Manual (11.3) explains that GC code applies to both the belligerent occupier and the occupied territory (USA). After one year the GC obligation expires for the occupied territory. “Remember China and Biden took control on 1/20/2021. One year will be 1/20/2022. After that date our military has the legal authority to take our country back. This is when 11.3 goes into effect.” https://drdannielleblumenthal.wordpress.com/2022/01/16/interesting-but-unverified-here-is-why-the-military-has-been-waiting-1-10-2022/ Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 17:27:06 40e5ab (1) No.15424271 >>15423529 pb DoD Manual is off this link https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf 11.3 https://qanon.pub/?q=11.3

H/T Genesis127

#KAGWAR

https://youtu.be/f-xwMSCdnW4 Clear your mind. Heal. Q

DOJ Criminal Investigation Requested Into Wisconsin Republicans Who Signed Forged Election Documents Posted on Fri, Jan 21st, 2022 Rep. Marc Pocan (D-WI) has sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland requesting a D.O.J. investigation into 10 Republicans who signed forged election documents. — Article: https://www.politicususa.com/2022/01/21/doj-criminal-investigation-requested-into-wisconsin-republicans-who-signed-forged-election-documents.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter Primary source: https://pocan.house.gov/sites/pocan.house.gov/files/Rep.%20Pocan%20Letter%20to%20AG%20Garland%20re%20Criminal%20Fraudulent%20Presidential%20Electors%201-21-22.pdf Last ditch efforts to cover up Search /QR/ Archives Qresear.ch - Search Past Articles I have covered - MICHIGAN Notable articles

Donald Trump Jr. @DonaldJTrumpJr The America First movement in North Carolina is rallying around @TedBuddNC to defeat RINO @PatMcCroryNC!!! We’ve gone from 40 points down at the start of this campaign to a commanding lead today. Our campaign momentum is only going to increase with your continued support. See you all at the rally with President Trump this Saturday! https://tedbudd.com/in-case-you-missed-it-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-mcwalker-part-deux/ 6:52 PM · Apr 5, 2022·Twitter Web App https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1511476935259480071

Anonymous 03/22/22 (Tue) 20:56:56 091346 (19) No.15922174 Richard Grenell @RichardGrenell Mark Zuckerberg helped give Joe Biden the election. Joe Biden helped give the Russians a green light for war in Ukraine. Russia banned Facebook. Zuckerberg’s money literally funded unprecedented inflation, a war and his loss of business in Russia. https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1506427009093701634