https://fb.watch/bGzTr1eLpO/

Anonymous 02/27/22 (Sun) 00:34:13 547811 (14) No.15735093 Proverbs 29:11 - Fools give full vent to their rage, but the wise bring calm in the end. Anonymous02/27/22 (Sun) 00:32:382c57c1 (2)No.15735083 https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1497803410443223041

VP Vance speaks at Munich Security Conference | LiveNOW from FOX Literally crying.mp4 The speech at the Munich Security Conference focuses on several key themes regarding the current state of democracy, security, and shared values between Europe and the United States: 1. Shared Values and Democratic Backsliding: • The speaker emphasizes the importance of shared democratic values, warning about the retreat from these values in Europe. Examples include the cancellation of elections in Romania, the suppression of free speech in Sweden, and the enforcement of laws against silent prayer in the UK. 2. Security Concerns: • While external threats like Russia and China are acknowledged, the primary concern is described as internal, specifically the erosion of democratic principles within Europe. The speaker criticizes actions that undermine democracy, like banning populist parties from conferences or censoring speech under the guise of combating misinformation. 3. Freedom of Expression and Democracy: • The narrative includes a critique of censorship, mentioning instances where governments have overstepped in controlling speech or punishing individuals for their beliefs or expressions, like the case of Adam Smith-Connor in the UK. There's a call for dialogue with all political factions, even those with differing or controversial views. 4. Immigration and Societal Impact: • Mass migration is highlighted as a significant issue, with the speaker noting its implications on security and societal cohesion, referencing a recent attack in Munich as an example of the consequences of unchecked immigration policies. 5. Leadership and Public Mandate: • The speaker advocates for leaders to listen to their citizens, suggesting that dismissing or ignoring public concerns can lead to the destruction of democracy. There's an emphasis on the need for leaders to secure democratic mandates through openness rather than suppression. 6. U.S.-Europe Relations: • The speech positions the U.S. under President Trump as supportive of free speech and against the censorship practices of the previous administration. It encourages Europe to step up in defense responsibilities while maintaining a strong democratic ethos. The speaker concludes with a call to uphold the principle that the voice of the people matters, suggesting that true security and progress come from engaging with and respecting the democratic process and its participants. GROK >Here’s a 200-word essay on the impact of digital media, written at an undergraduate level with three sources: Digital media has profoundly transformed society, influencing communication, information access, and cultural dynamics. Its impact is multifaceted, offering both opportunities and challenges. One significant effect is the democratization of information. Platforms like Twitter and YouTube allow individuals to share content globally, bypassing traditional gatekeepers such as newspapers or television networks (Jenkins, 2006). This has empowered marginalized voices but also contributed to the spread of misinformation, as unverified content can gain traction rapidly. Digital media has also reshaped social interactions. Social networking sites like Facebook and Instagram facilitate connectivity, enabling relationships across distances. However, studies suggest excessive use can lead to mental health issues, including anxiety and depression, due to social comparison and cyberbullying (Twenge, 2017). The constant connectivity can blur boundaries between personal and professional life, impacting well-being. Economically, digital media has revolutionized industries. Online advertising and e-commerce have created new revenue streams, while traditional media outlets struggle to adapt (Napoli, 2011). However, this shift has raised concerns about data privacy and the monopolistic power of tech giants. In conclusion, digital media's impact is profound, offering unprecedented access and connectivity while posing challenges to information integrity, mental health, and economic equity. Sources: • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. NYU Press. • Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen. Atria Books. • Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience Evolution. Columbia University Press. This essay balances the positive and negative impacts of digital media, supported by credible academic sources. Social media regulation Social media regulation has become a pivotal topic worldwide due to the significant impact platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, and others have on individuals, societies, and global politics. Here's an overview of the key aspects, challenges, and approaches to social media regulation: Key Aspects of Social Media Regulation: 1. Content Moderation: • Hate Speech, Misinformation, and Fake News: Regulating content to prevent the spread of harmful information, including hate speech, misinformation, and fake news, is crucial. The challenge lies in defining what constitutes such content without infringing on free speech. 2. Data Privacy and Protection: • Regulations like the GDPR in Europe aim to give users control over their personal data, compelling platforms to be transparent about data collection and usage practices. 3. Child Protection: • There are efforts to protect minors from inappropriate content, cyberbullying, and online predators, often involving age verification, parental controls, and content filters. 4. Advertising and Transparency: • Ensuring transparency in political and commercial advertising to combat foreign interference in elections and manipulation of public opinion. 5. Accountability and Platform Liability: • Laws like Section 230 in the U.S. protect platforms from being liable for user-generated content, sparking debates on whether this shield should be adjusted to make platforms more accountable for content. Challenges: • Balancing Free Speech and Regulation: One of the most significant challenges is ensuring that regulation does not overly restrict free speech or become a tool for censorship. • Global vs. Local Regulations: Social media operates globally, but regulatory approaches differ widely across countries, leading to compliance issues for multinational platforms. • Technological Limitations: The speed and scale at which content spreads often outpace the ability of platforms or regulators to moderate effectively. • Evolving Nature of Social Media: As platforms evolve, so do the methods of misuse, requiring adaptive regulatory frameworks. Approaches to Regulation: 1. Legislation: • GDPR (EU): Focuses on data protection and privacy. • Digital Services Act (EU): Aims at making the internet safer, with rules for content moderation and transparency. • Proposed Bills in the U.S.: Like the SAFE TECH Act, which seeks to amend Section 230 to increase platform accountability. 2. Self-Regulation: • Companies have developed their policies for content moderation, transparency reports, and community standards. However, self-regulation's effectiveness is often debated. 3. Co-regulation: • Combining government oversight with industry self-regulation, where platforms must adhere to certain standards but have some autonomy in how they achieve compliance. 4. International Cooperation: • Given the global nature of social media, there's a push for international standards or cooperation to address issues like cross-border misinformation. Future Directions: • AI and Algorithm Transparency: Increasing calls for transparency in how algorithms work, especially concerning content promotion and user targeting. • Interoperability: Discussions on whether users should have the right to move their social media presence between platforms, impacting data portability and competition. • Ethical Considerations: Integrating ethical AI use in content moderation to avoid biases and ensure fairness. The landscape of social media regulation is continuously evolving as new issues emerge, technology advances, and public opinion shifts. Effective regulation requires a nuanced approach that respects individual rights while safeguarding public interest, often necessitating a blend of legislative, corporate, and user-driven initiatives.

President Donald Trump may soon be a major pain in Leticia's ass The Trump Administration is accusing Leticia James of mortgage fraud as well as marriage fraud when she claimed her father as her husband, sends a criminal referral to AG Pam Bondi. James relentlessly attacked the President Trump Campaign, falsifying information and slandering him, his family, and businesses not only to harm him, but also to influence and subvert the election. All the while, She was pretending to be married to her father, while lying on multiple properties and mortgage documents to obtain preferable terms. >THE DOCUMENTS ARE DAMNING. #Letitia_James  https://www.qnotables.com/forum/notables/president-donald-trump-may-soon-be-a-major-pain-in-leticia-s-ass video_2025-04-16_14-16-16.mp4 This is the second sketchy communist democrat to commit marriage fraud for the purposes of undermining and attacking the United States of America. DC_Draino @DC_Draino Boy does Letitia James sound nervous! They say a guilty dog barks the loudest so she’s sounding REAL guilty Listen Letitia - you say you went to the best schools, but maybe they forgot to teach you this: “If you come for the king, you best not miss” Also known as FAFO Anonymous  04/16/25 (Wed) 14:48:23                 73e8c9 (2) No.22920803

Mark Levin challenges legal dispute around Trump tariffs 📌 Full Summary of Levin's Argument on Trump Tariffs and the Constitution 🔷 Opening Context (00:00–01:18) Mark Levin opens the show with a brief mention of his guests but quickly transitions into the core topic: a legal battle over the constitutionality of tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. He frames the debate not as an economic issue, but as a constitutional question about the separation of powers. 🔷 Congressional Authority on Tariffs (01:18–03:17) Levin explains that under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress holds exclusive power to “lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises,” and regulate commerce with foreign nations. He references a federal trade court decision ruling that Trump's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs was unconstitutional. The court’s reasoning was that tariff authority is non-delegable and must remain with Congress. 🔷 The Trade Court’s Ruling (03:17–05:24) The Court of International Trade, a body with life-appointed judges created by Congress, ruled 3–0 against Trump’s tariffs. It held that Trump’s actions exceeded the limits of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).The judges argued that Trump’s retaliatory tariffs lacked the "unusual and extraordinary threat" required by the IEEPA and were therefore beyond statutory and constitutional authority. The court used the Federalist Papers and the non-delegation doctrine to support its decision. 🔷 Emergency Powers and Their Use (05:24–06:35) Levin reviews the 1977 IEEPA statute, specifically 50 U.S. Code §1701–1702, which allows the president to act during a declared national emergency when a significant foreign threat exists. Trump used this authority to apply global tariffs in response to perceived economic threats. Levin admits the move might stretch the statute's intent but defends it as still within the legal framework passed by Congress. 🔷 Appellate Court Response (06:35–07:01) Shortly after the trade court’s ruling, an appellate court issued a temporary stay on the enforcement of the lower court’s decision. The cases were consolidated, and Trump’s tariffs remain in effect pending further review. 🔷 Levin's Core Argument: No Separation of Powers Dispute Exists (07:01–08:58) Levin states the entire dispute hinges on a supposed separation of powers conflict—whether Congress improperly delegated power to the executive. But he emphasizes a key fact: Congress is not a party to the lawsuit. Only private litigants brought the suit. Levin argues that if Congress felt its constitutional powers had been usurped, it could have intervened. Congress hasn’t passed any law challenging Trump's tariffs, hasn’t joined the suit, and hasn’t even voiced opposition in a unified manner. He calls the plaintiffs’ argument illegitimate because they are attempting to enforce congressional authority that Congress itself has declined to assert. 🔷 The Role and Limits of the Trade Court (08:58–13:27) Levin questions the legitimacy of the trade court’s involvement. He argues that: • The trade court was created by Congress and has no constitutional authority on its own. • Judicial review is not explicitly in the Constitution and was claimed through precedent (Marbury v. Madison, 1803). • Because Congress passed the 1977 law and hasn't challenged Trump’s use of it, the trade court has no basis to override the executive branch. He sees this as a case of judicial overreach, where a court acts unilaterally without a genuine constitutional dispute between the other two branches. 🔷 Historical Overreach and Judicial Supremacy (13:27–15:58) Levin critiques the doctrine of judicial supremacy, tracing it back to Chief Justice Marshall’s Marbury v. Madison. He asserts that this decision created a precedent for the courts to assume powers not explicitly granted in the Constitution. He warns that this case is part of a broader trend in which the judiciary overrides both elected branches, despite lacking electoral accountability or checks and balances. Levin contends that judicial power has grown beyond what the framers intended. 🔷 Final Constitutional Critique (15:58–18:06) Levin concludes that: • Whether one supports tariffs or not, the Constitution is clear that Congress holds tariff authority. • However, since Congress passed the IEEPA and hasn’t reined in the President’s use of it, the court should not substitute its interpretation over Congress’s inaction. • The problem isn’t the President or Congress—it’s the judges who have seized power to make constitutional judgments in areas where no conflict between the branches exists. 🔷 Closing Warning (18:06–18:31) Levin ends with a warning: tyranny can arise in any branch of government, including the judiciary. He calls for law schools, lawyers, and judges to return to a proper understanding of constitutional limits, particularly the original balance of power among the branches. He urges viewers to care more about constitutional structure than policy preferences like support or opposition to tariffs. ✅ Conclusion: Levin’s central thesis is that the trade court’s intervention violates constitutional limits because Congress hasn’t acted to defend its own powers. He sees the judiciary as overstepping its role and calls for a restoration of original constitutional governance, where only elected officials can check each other, and courts do not act on policy disagreements without standing from another branch. Let me know if you want a visual aid, press release version, or an academic-style abstract of this summary.

For it is believing in your heart that you are made right with God, and it is by openly declaring your faith that you are saved. - Romans 10:10

H/T Genesis127

Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 17:27:33 1bad06 (12) No.15424278 Song Dedicated to Donald Trump— “My Way— by Sinatra 🍿🇺🇸 Jan 19 2022 9:11p ET #Marker - Dan Scavino Jr for 45 🎶 And Now, The End Is Near Dan Scavino Jr on FBook https://fb.watch/aEH92qybvH/ Sounds a lot like winning

Anonymous 07/11/23 (Tue) 22:08:06 ceff3b (5) No.19164260 ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANO GIVES THE WORLD A WARNING.  

Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 15:20:22 f46399 (11) No.15423529 I'm not claiming that this is what will happen. To most anons, the fact that we've been at infiltrated has been apparent for decades. I've had my mind set on moving towards 2022 and 2024 elections to take it back, but should these dots align and hold some truth, I will be forever greatful. I do recommend your personal preparedness. Make efforts to have a few weeks of emergency supplies on hand. Once we break through to the other side of this there will be periods of unrest and chaos in locations. Do not be afraid, be prepared. https://www.thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22strike+like%22 Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 15:39:54 7677ab (2) No.15423672 >>15423571 “If you look at 11.3 in the DOD manual you see they talk about GC. Trump does everything by the book. You may not like it but in order for us to get to the finish line we must play by the rules set down for us. If we break GC code we risk the globalists getting involved using NATO. Remember we are also at war with the globalists and they would not hesitate to get involved if given a reason. “The DOD Law of War Manual (11.3) explains that GC code applies to both the belligerent occupier and the occupied territory (USA). After one year the GC obligation expires for the occupied territory. “Remember China and Biden took control on 1/20/2021. One year will be 1/20/2022. After that date our military has the legal authority to take our country back. This is when 11.3 goes into effect.” https://drdannielleblumenthal.wordpress.com/2022/01/16/interesting-but-unverified-here-is-why-the-military-has-been-waiting-1-10-2022/ Anonymous 01/20/22 (Thu) 17:27:06 40e5ab (1) No.15424271 >>15423529 pb DoD Manual is off this link https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf 11.3 https://qanon.pub/?q=11.3