Anonymous  01/30/25 (Thu) 17:00:05  d56c75 (12) No.22470644 Here's Tulsi's opening statement video https://x.com/dotconnectinga/status/1884993300676940029 Gabbard at DNI Hearing: Dems Upset 'I Refuse to Be Their Puppet' https://www.newsmax.com/politics/dni-tulsi-gabbard-senate/2025/01/30/id/1197129/ (1/2) Tulsi Gabbard, President Donald Trump's pick to be director of national intelligence, faced sharp criticism from Democrats on Thursday during a fiery confirmation hearing focused on her past comments sympathetic to Russia, her meeting with Syria's now-deposed leader and her past support for government leaker Edward Snowden. Gabbard's opening statement went all-in on critics opposed to her nomination because she asks tough questions and does not always follow Washington dogma. "The fact is what truly unsettles my political opponents is that I refuse to be their puppet," she said. Gabbard started her hearing by telling lawmakers that big changes are needed to address years of failures of America's intelligence service. She said too often intelligence has been false or politicized, leading to wars, foreign policy failures and the misuse of espionage. And she said those lapses have continued as the U.S. faces renewed threats from Russia and China. "The bottom line is this must end. President Trump's reelection is a clear mandate from the American people to break this cycle of failure and the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community," Gabbard told the Senate Intelligence Committee. Gabbard promised to be objective and noted her military service, saying she would bring the same sense of duty and responsibility to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees and coordinates the work of 18 intelligence agencies. Gabbard, a former Democrat congresswoman from Hawaii, is a lieutenant colonel in the National Guard who deployed twice to the Middle East and ran for president in 2020. She has no formal intelligence experience, however, and has never run a government agency or department. It is Gabbard's comments, however, that have posed the biggest challenge to her confirmation. Gabbard has repeatedly echoed Russian propaganda used to justify the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine and criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a corrupt autocrat. She has been accused of spreading Russian disinformation by Republican lawmakers and has even won praise in Russian state-controlled media. Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., asked Gabbard on Thursday whether Russia would "get a pass" from her. "Senator I'm offended by the question," Gabbard responded. "Because my sole focus, commitment and responsibility is about our own nation, our own security and the interests of the American people." A 2017 visit with Syrian President Bashar Assad is another point of contention. Assad was recently deposed as his country's leader following a brutal civil war in which he was accused of using chemical weapons. Following her visit, Gabbard faced criticism that she was legitimizing a dictator and then more questions when she said she was skeptical that Assad had used chemical weapons. Anonymous  01/30/25 (Thu) 17:00:22 d56c75 (12) No.22470647 >>22470644 (2/2) "I just do not understand show you can blame NATO for (Russian President Vladimir) Putin's brutal invasion of Ukraine, and when Assad used chemical weapons against his own people, you didn't condemn him," said the committee's senior Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia. Gabbard defended her meeting with Assad, saying she used the opportunity to press the Syrian leader on his human rights record. "I asked him tough questions about his own regime's actions," Gabbard said. In a back-and-forth that at times grew heated, lawmakers from both parties raised concerns about her past statements supportive of Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor who fled to Russia after he was charged with revealing classified information about surveillance programs. Gabbard said, while Snowden revealed important facts about surveillance programs she believes are unconstitutional, he violated rules about protecting classified secrets. "Edward Snowden broke the law," she said. Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., repeatedly pressed Gabbard on whether she believed Snowden is a traitor. "Yes or no, is Edward Snowden a traitor to the United States of America?" Gabbard responded directly. "As someone who has served in uniform in combat, I understand how critical our national security is," she said before Bennet cut her off, saying "Apparently, you don't." As a lawmaker, Gabbard sponsored legislation that would have repealed a key surveillance program known as Section 702, which allows authorities to collect the communications of suspected terrorists overseas. Gabbard argued then that the program could be violating the rights of Americans whose communications are swept up inadvertently, but national security officials say the program has saved lives. She now says she supports the program, noting new safeguards designed to protect Americans' privacy.Gabbard defended her change of opinion. While lawmakers from both parties have raised concerns about Gabbard's nomination, Republicans have increasingly come to support her. Given thin Republican margins in the Senate, she will need almost all GOP senators to vote yes in order to win confirmation. Sen. Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, supports Gabbard's nomination and said at the start of Thursday's hearing that he hopes she can rein in an office that he said has grown too large and bureaucratic. Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, noted the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is now larger, in terms of staffing, than any of the agencies it was created to oversee. "Look at where conventional thinking has got us. Maybe Washington could use a little more unconventional thinking," Cotton said. "Ms. Gabbard, I submit that, if confirmed, the measure of your success will largely depend on whether you can return the ODNI to its original size, scope, and mission."

Anonymous 03/16/22 (Wed) 23:50:40 38c65b (11) No.15880711 >>15880663 https://www.tiktok.com/@maryjones5865/video/7075380300314103086

I've been aware of the systematic destruction of our country for nearly 15 years. I honorably discharged from the US Army in the late 2000's due to the political corruption in Washington DC and the realization that those who were pulling the strings were utilizing us as sacrificial pawns. After returning back home, I briefly attempted to assimilate into society and tried to ignore the glaring issues and rot that the rest of the world had seemingly become oblivious and complacent to. Attempting to live in that lie caused internal conflict, destructive behavior, and depression. I tried to tell friends and family for years but could not break through. I lashed out at society and began to shun those who refused to look for themselves and continued to fall for the lies. As the Q operation came online, I tried even harder to wake people up to what was happening. I tried to show them what I was seeing. Co-workers, friends, family, anyone who would listen to me. Many pulled away in judgement of what I was telling them, some in my family became concerned for my mental health as I typically unloaded my spiritual revelations, growth, and struggles on my own family. I quickly realized how large and complicated the full picture was becoming to explain. I knew someone needed to preserve what we were seeing and from the perspective of an anon. In the first few years of the op, many anons were suggesting a "QNN" News Network type platform, yet the only thing I saw coming out of it were pepe memes sitting at a news desk and a few alternative video hosting platforms popped up. Some anons have created automated aggregators to present baker notables utilizing scraping programs, there are forums and alternative video hosting platforms, some have become somewhat popular. Some anons made their own news blasts on social media, but after personally being banned off of Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit multiple times, I felt like a stand alone platform in a news like format could work out well. I wanted to build a hub where anons could work, share, build, learn with each other and research together. Publicly, yet in peace. Free from the shill element that is present on every social media platform and image board. A site that ran parallel to the ongoing and potentially never ending cyber-war and psychological operations, operated in a semi-professional manner that was entertaining yet did not create a negative distorted image of the movement. A place to help organize and drive the narrative. I hoped to present it in a way that proved useful for seeing the story arc, provided historical perspective and taught people from all walks of life how to see, and also see through the narrative. As this resource stands now it serves as a library, a historical archive, a loose guide to the operation and more, but is open for anon community building, research and collaboration. I wanted to show the world the war we were fighting, to those who struggled to see it. Presented in a way they could comfortably digest the information. Sometimes during my political rants with my own dad, he would insist that he has known about the infiltration for decades, yet he never fought back or had ever attempted to explain what he thought was going on despite me having enlisted in the military. He has often said "Tucker, Sean, and Mark see it and yell about it all the time! What the hell are you and I supposed to do about it?" This resource is what I did about it. Is it effective? Will it be effective? Time will tell. This is a marathon not a sprint. Built it for anons. A place to archive news, Research to collaborate, build upon and share, as well as help teach and inspire new generations of anons.This site has been curated almost entirely with anon posts from the research boards, embedded news sources and attributed social media accounts. I just framed the architecture, archived and organized as many notables, and decodes as I could, while providing occasional commentary. I started this effort in Jan 2019 and have personally logged over 3500 archived notables at the time of this post. They have all been purposefully formatted and organized as best I could on the fly. Most archived posts are crafted and presented in a way that I hoped would be consumable by a general audience who is just starting to seek the truth themselves. Most importantly I wanted it to still remain memorable and important to anons and their efforts for years to come. I never intended to do this alone. In my opinion a team of 4 -10 quality anons would make this an extremely effective concept. I reached out to the /qr/ board a few times over the years to spark up interest, yet never had anyone volunteer to help. I have been honored to have this resource listed in the bakers "dough" for over 3 years and more than 11,000 "breads". I have another upcoming medical procedure to address nerve complications from old injuries that will likely require a second surgery. These last two injuries coupled with old service connected issues have created a situation in which I am fearful of my ability to preform my current job's physical requirements. I am becoming concerned about how much time I have left there and how I am going to be able to continue supporting my family in the way that I have, once I commit to leaving or they force me out. In 2018 I was enrolled in college as an attempt to escape that unfulfilling job, however I opted to stop my degree program to pursue building this website as I recognized the gravity of the operation and the historic nature of what we have worked to expose. I saw how quickly big tech could erase us and I sought to circumvent them. I realize that Truth Social is the designated platform to push the narrative forward, however I plan to keep this resource maintained and available for the foreseeable future as it remains a powerful tool, but I am unsure of my effectiveness due to potentially limited availability. If anyone wants to take a shot at helping, either temporarily or as a long term part of this effort, feel free to reach out. qnotables@protonmail.com -or- https://truthsocial.com/@TheRooster17

Anonymous 04/05/22 (Tue) 18:28:50 56eacc (1) No.16018935

Anonymous 03/17/22 (Thu) 14:38:01 097cdb (4) No.15884996 The Bee: 99.9% Of Americans Support Sending Mitt Romney To Fight In Ukraine https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1504487705010491393

Anonymous 03/17/22 (Thu) 15:21:01 197589 (12) No.15885314 Posting Dan's vid again…in case you missed it! from Truth Social Dan Scavino🇺🇸🦅 / @DanScavino 03/17/2022 09:41:14 This is absolutely awesome! February 2006, wait for it🏀🏀🏀🏀🏀🏀‼️‼️‼️ #ThrowbackThursday #TBT

Wrapping up Rally in Michigan 10.01.2022

Anonymous 04/03/22 (Sun) 20:02:53 d69b60 (20) No.16006468 Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 MICHIGAN ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🦅 https://t.co/noz2fgy7UG https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1510672271505072128

Anonymous 04/16/22 (Sat) 06:41:41 8b34dd (25) No.16086310 Elon Musk @elonmusk Happy Easter! Follow the 🐇 6:47 PM · Apr 12, 2020·Twitter for iPhone https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1249469876277633024 DayQuil or NyQuil? www.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1249469876277633024 Anonymous 04/16/22 (Sat) 07:01:43 8b34dd (25) No.16086363 Musk Responds to Reports Twitter Mulling ‘Poison Pill’ Tactic to Foil His Takeover Bid

Michael T. Flynn 🙏🏼 🇺🇸 @TrueGenFlynn 1h @realDonaldTrump The Founding Fathers & Revolutionary Patriots sacrificed beyond words & did all the work for us. All they asked of us was to protect and defend what turned out to be the greatest country in the history of the world. As a country we've made our share of mistakes, but no country can compare with our overall record of giving, goodness, sacrifices & freedom. This indictment is not only an insult of historic proportion to our Founders & all Patriots since then who shed their blood to preserve our freedoms; but must serve as a wake up call for all U.S. citizens who believe America is worth saving. When you combine the effort by the myriad of internal bad actors within our government bureaucracies & throughout society with the escalating ambitions of the CCP, I pray we even get the opportunity to save the Nation in 2024…the "assessment" trends are not in the favor of The Founders. Stand firm in what you believe in, strengthen your own personal faith & consider again, is your community worth sacrificing for? Time now to speak up! Mar 31, 2023, 5:59 AM https://truthsocial.com/@TrueGenFlynn/posts/110118013968594991 https://twitter.com/genflynn/status/1641786925676634118

Summin' up. Broken clock is right. Tide shift. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez explains how a no-fly-zone would make the US a direct participant in Ukraine, escalating it into full scale war. https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1504567110889922560

https://fb.watch/bGzTr1eLpO/

When the beating of you heart echos the beating of the drums, there is a life about to start when tomorrow comes. https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1932961606184374767 singing the song of angry men.mp4 >We will not be slaves again. >Join in the fight that will give you the right to be free. #TheGreatAwakening #WWG1WGA #NCSWIC #MAGA https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino/114667622091382263

Anonymous 02/27/22 (Sun) 00:34:13 547811 (14) No.15735093 Proverbs 29:11 - Fools give full vent to their rage, but the wise bring calm in the end. Anonymous02/27/22 (Sun) 00:32:382c57c1 (2)No.15735083 https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1497803410443223041

VP Vance speaks at Munich Security Conference | LiveNOW from FOX Literally crying.mp4 The speech at the Munich Security Conference focuses on several key themes regarding the current state of democracy, security, and shared values between Europe and the United States: 1. Shared Values and Democratic Backsliding: • The speaker emphasizes the importance of shared democratic values, warning about the retreat from these values in Europe. Examples include the cancellation of elections in Romania, the suppression of free speech in Sweden, and the enforcement of laws against silent prayer in the UK. 2. Security Concerns: • While external threats like Russia and China are acknowledged, the primary concern is described as internal, specifically the erosion of democratic principles within Europe. The speaker criticizes actions that undermine democracy, like banning populist parties from conferences or censoring speech under the guise of combating misinformation. 3. Freedom of Expression and Democracy: • The narrative includes a critique of censorship, mentioning instances where governments have overstepped in controlling speech or punishing individuals for their beliefs or expressions, like the case of Adam Smith-Connor in the UK. There's a call for dialogue with all political factions, even those with differing or controversial views. 4. Immigration and Societal Impact: • Mass migration is highlighted as a significant issue, with the speaker noting its implications on security and societal cohesion, referencing a recent attack in Munich as an example of the consequences of unchecked immigration policies. 5. Leadership and Public Mandate: • The speaker advocates for leaders to listen to their citizens, suggesting that dismissing or ignoring public concerns can lead to the destruction of democracy. There's an emphasis on the need for leaders to secure democratic mandates through openness rather than suppression. 6. U.S.-Europe Relations: • The speech positions the U.S. under President Trump as supportive of free speech and against the censorship practices of the previous administration. It encourages Europe to step up in defense responsibilities while maintaining a strong democratic ethos. The speaker concludes with a call to uphold the principle that the voice of the people matters, suggesting that true security and progress come from engaging with and respecting the democratic process and its participants. GROK >Here’s a 200-word essay on the impact of digital media, written at an undergraduate level with three sources: Digital media has profoundly transformed society, influencing communication, information access, and cultural dynamics. Its impact is multifaceted, offering both opportunities and challenges. One significant effect is the democratization of information. Platforms like Twitter and YouTube allow individuals to share content globally, bypassing traditional gatekeepers such as newspapers or television networks (Jenkins, 2006). This has empowered marginalized voices but also contributed to the spread of misinformation, as unverified content can gain traction rapidly. Digital media has also reshaped social interactions. Social networking sites like Facebook and Instagram facilitate connectivity, enabling relationships across distances. However, studies suggest excessive use can lead to mental health issues, including anxiety and depression, due to social comparison and cyberbullying (Twenge, 2017). The constant connectivity can blur boundaries between personal and professional life, impacting well-being. Economically, digital media has revolutionized industries. Online advertising and e-commerce have created new revenue streams, while traditional media outlets struggle to adapt (Napoli, 2011). However, this shift has raised concerns about data privacy and the monopolistic power of tech giants. In conclusion, digital media's impact is profound, offering unprecedented access and connectivity while posing challenges to information integrity, mental health, and economic equity. Sources: • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. NYU Press. • Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen. Atria Books. • Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience Evolution. Columbia University Press. This essay balances the positive and negative impacts of digital media, supported by credible academic sources. Social media regulation Social media regulation has become a pivotal topic worldwide due to the significant impact platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, and others have on individuals, societies, and global politics. Here's an overview of the key aspects, challenges, and approaches to social media regulation: Key Aspects of Social Media Regulation: 1. Content Moderation: • Hate Speech, Misinformation, and Fake News: Regulating content to prevent the spread of harmful information, including hate speech, misinformation, and fake news, is crucial. The challenge lies in defining what constitutes such content without infringing on free speech. 2. Data Privacy and Protection: • Regulations like the GDPR in Europe aim to give users control over their personal data, compelling platforms to be transparent about data collection and usage practices. 3. Child Protection: • There are efforts to protect minors from inappropriate content, cyberbullying, and online predators, often involving age verification, parental controls, and content filters. 4. Advertising and Transparency: • Ensuring transparency in political and commercial advertising to combat foreign interference in elections and manipulation of public opinion. 5. Accountability and Platform Liability: • Laws like Section 230 in the U.S. protect platforms from being liable for user-generated content, sparking debates on whether this shield should be adjusted to make platforms more accountable for content. Challenges: • Balancing Free Speech and Regulation: One of the most significant challenges is ensuring that regulation does not overly restrict free speech or become a tool for censorship. • Global vs. Local Regulations: Social media operates globally, but regulatory approaches differ widely across countries, leading to compliance issues for multinational platforms. • Technological Limitations: The speed and scale at which content spreads often outpace the ability of platforms or regulators to moderate effectively. • Evolving Nature of Social Media: As platforms evolve, so do the methods of misuse, requiring adaptive regulatory frameworks. Approaches to Regulation: 1. Legislation: • GDPR (EU): Focuses on data protection and privacy. • Digital Services Act (EU): Aims at making the internet safer, with rules for content moderation and transparency. • Proposed Bills in the U.S.: Like the SAFE TECH Act, which seeks to amend Section 230 to increase platform accountability. 2. Self-Regulation: • Companies have developed their policies for content moderation, transparency reports, and community standards. However, self-regulation's effectiveness is often debated. 3. Co-regulation: • Combining government oversight with industry self-regulation, where platforms must adhere to certain standards but have some autonomy in how they achieve compliance. 4. International Cooperation: • Given the global nature of social media, there's a push for international standards or cooperation to address issues like cross-border misinformation. Future Directions: • AI and Algorithm Transparency: Increasing calls for transparency in how algorithms work, especially concerning content promotion and user targeting. • Interoperability: Discussions on whether users should have the right to move their social media presence between platforms, impacting data portability and competition. • Ethical Considerations: Integrating ethical AI use in content moderation to avoid biases and ensure fairness. The landscape of social media regulation is continuously evolving as new issues emerge, technology advances, and public opinion shifts. Effective regulation requires a nuanced approach that respects individual rights while safeguarding public interest, often necessitating a blend of legislative, corporate, and user-driven initiatives.

President Donald Trump may soon be a major pain in Leticia's ass The Trump Administration is accusing Leticia James of mortgage fraud as well as marriage fraud when she claimed her father as her husband, sends a criminal referral to AG Pam Bondi. James relentlessly attacked the President Trump Campaign, falsifying information and slandering him, his family, and businesses not only to harm him, but also to influence and subvert the election. All the while, She was pretending to be married to her father, while lying on multiple properties and mortgage documents to obtain preferable terms. >THE DOCUMENTS ARE DAMNING. #Letitia_James  https://www.qnotables.com/forum/notables/president-donald-trump-may-soon-be-a-major-pain-in-leticia-s-ass video_2025-04-16_14-16-16.mp4 This is the second sketchy communist democrat to commit marriage fraud for the purposes of undermining and attacking the United States of America. DC_Draino @DC_Draino Boy does Letitia James sound nervous! They say a guilty dog barks the loudest so she’s sounding REAL guilty Listen Letitia - you say you went to the best schools, but maybe they forgot to teach you this: “If you come for the king, you best not miss” Also known as FAFO Anonymous  04/16/25 (Wed) 14:48:23                 73e8c9 (2) No.22920803